Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 16;10(1):42.
doi: 10.1186/s40813-024-00395-5.

Estimating the individual stillborn rate from easy-to-collect sow data on farm: an application of the bayesian network model

Affiliations

Estimating the individual stillborn rate from easy-to-collect sow data on farm: an application of the bayesian network model

Charlotte Teixeira Costa et al. Porcine Health Manag. .

Abstract

Background: A high number of stillborn piglets has a negative impact on production and animal welfare. It is an important contributor to piglet mortality around farrowing and continues to rise with the increase of prolificacy. The objective of this study was to build a predictive model of the stillborn rate.

Results: This study was performed on two farrow-to-finish farms and one farrow-to-wean farm located in Brittany, France. At each farm, the number of total born (TB), born alive (BA), stillborn piglets (S), the same data at the previous farrowing (TBn- 1, BAn- 1 and Sn- 1), backfat thickness just before farrowing and at previous weaning and parity rank were recorded in our dataset of 3686 farrowings. Bayesian networks were used as an integrated modelling approach to investigate risk factors associated with stillbirth using BayesiaLab® software. Our results suggest the validity of a hybrid model to predict the percentage of stillborn piglets. Three significant risk factors were identified by the model: parity rank (percentage of total mutual information: MI = 64%), Sn- 1 (MI = 25%) and TBn- 1 (MI = 11%). Additionally, backfat thickness just before farrowing was also identified for sows of parity five or more (MI = 0.4%). In practice, under optimal conditions (i.e., low parity rank, less than 8% of stillborn piglets, and a prolificacy lower than 14 piglets at the previous farrowing), our model predicted a stillborn rate almost halved, from 6.5% (mean risk of our dataset) to 3.5% for a sow at the next farrowing. In contrast, in older sows with a backfat thickness less than 15 mm, more than 15% of stillborn and a prolificacy greater than 18 piglets at the previous farrowing, the risk is multiplied by 2.5 from 6.5 to 15.7%.

Conclusion: Our results highlight the impact of parity, previous prolificacy and stillborn rate on the probability of stillborn. Moreover, the importance of backfat thickness, especially in old sows, must be considered. This information can help farmers classify and manage sows according to their risk of giving birth to stillborn piglets.

Keywords: Bayesian networks; Decision-making tool; Farrowing; Predictive model; Sow; Stillborn piglets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Effect of variables on the expected change in the stillborn rate compared to the baseline (fixed at 6.5% from our dataset) rate for the three farms included in the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Final model obtained with BayesiaLab® software KL: Kullback-Leibler divergences. The black bars represent the distribution for each variable.

References

    1. Pandolfi F, Edwards SA, Robert F, Kyriazakis I. Risk factors associated with the different categories of piglet perinatal mortality in French farms. Prev Vet Med. 2017;137:1–12. - PubMed
    1. Rosendo A, Druet T, Gogué J, Canario L, Bidanel J. Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French large White pigs. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:1615–24. - PubMed
    1. Vallet J, Miles J, Brown-Brandl T, Nienaber J. Proportion of the litter farrowed, litter size, and progesterone and estradiol effects on piglet birth intervals and stillbirths. Anim Reprod Sci. 2010;119:68–75. - PubMed
    1. Stygar AH, Chantziaras I, Maes D, Aarestrup Moustsen V, De Meyer D, Quesnel H, et al. Economic feasibility of interventions targeted at decreasing piglet perinatal and pre-weaning mortality across European countries. Porc Health Manag. 2022;8:22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schoos A, Muro BBD, Carnevale RF, Chantziaras I, Biebaut E, Janssens GPJ, et al. Relationship between piglets’ survivability and farrowing kinetics in hyper-prolific sows. Porc Health Manag. 2023;9:37. - PMC - PubMed