Adverse Impacts of PEGylated Protein Therapeutics: A Targeted Literature Review
- PMID: 39417964
- PMCID: PMC11530478
- DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00684-z
Adverse Impacts of PEGylated Protein Therapeutics: A Targeted Literature Review
Abstract
The beneficial effects of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated therapeutics, such as increased half-life, solubility, stability, and decreased immunogenicity, have been well described. There have been concerns, however, about adverse outcomes with their use, but understanding of those adverse outcomes is still relatively limited. The present study aimed to characterize adverse outcomes associated with PEGylation of protein-based therapeutics on immunogenicity, pharmacologic properties, and safety. A targeted review of English language articles published from 1990 to September 29, 2023, was conducted. Of the 29 studies included in this review, 18 reported adverse safety outcomes such as hematologic complications, hepatic toxicity, injection site reactions, arthralgia, nausea, infections, grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs), and AE-related discontinuations and dose modifications. Fifteen studies reported immunogenicity-related outcomes, such as the prevalence of pre-existing antibodies to PEG, treatment-emergent antibody response, and hypersensitivity reactions to PEGylated drugs. Seven studies reported pharmacological outcomes such as increased clearance and reduced activity in response to PEGylated drugs. This review aims to contribute to a balanced view of PEGylated therapies by summarizing the adverse outcomes or lack of benefit associated with PEGylated therapeutics reported in the literature. We identified several studies characterizing adverse outcomes, pharmacological effects, and immunogenicity associated with the use of PEGylated therapeutics. Our findings suggest that using PEGylated therapeutics may require careful monitoring for adverse safety outcomes, including screening and monitoring for pre-existing antibodies and those induced in response to PEGylated therapy, as well as monitoring and adjusting the dosing of PEGylated therapeutics.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
C.L. is employed by Sanofi and may own Sanofi stock or stock options. During the course of the research, M.M. was employed by Sanofi and was a shareholder. Y.K. and V.P. are employed by Evidera, a part of Thermo Fisher Scientific which provides consulting and other research services to pharmaceutical, medical device, and related organizations. In their salaried positions, they work with a variety of companies and organizations and are precluded from receiving payment or honoraria directly from these organizations for services rendered. Evidera received funding from Sanofi to participate in the development of this manuscript. C.W. has received personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL-Vifor, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi outside the submitted work.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
