Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 17;19(10):e0295994.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295994. eCollection 2024.

The RECONCILE study protocol: Exploiting image-based risk stratification in early prostate cancer to discriminate progressors from non-progressors (RECONCILE)

Affiliations

The RECONCILE study protocol: Exploiting image-based risk stratification in early prostate cancer to discriminate progressors from non-progressors (RECONCILE)

Teresa Marsden et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: RECONCILE (ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04340245) will identify molecular and radiomic markers associated with clinical progression and radiological progression events in a cohort of localised, newly diagnosed Gleason 3 + 4 tumours. Molecular markers will be correlated against standard of care MRI-targeted histology and oncological outcomes.

Methods: RECONCILE is an ethics approved (20/LO/0366) single centre, prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study of recently diagnosed (within 12 months), organ-confined Gleason 3 + 4 cancers (MCCL ≤10mm) currently under active surveillance. 60 treatment-naïve participants with a concordant MRI lesion (Likert score 4 or 5) and PSA ≤ 15 ng/ml will be recruited. Blood, urine and targeted prostate tissue cores will be subject to next generation sequencing at baseline and one year in all participants. Semen will be collected from a specified sub-population. Baseline and interval MR images will be extracted from standard of care prostate MRI ahead of radiomic analysis. Data extracted from radiological and biological samples will be used to derive the association of molecular change and radiological progression, the primary outcome of the study. To compensate for spatial intratumoral heterogeneity and inherent sampling bias, a molecular index will be derived for each participant using the molecular profile of tumour tissue at both baseline (MolBL) and one year (MolFU). We will extract a ΔMolBL:MolFU score for each participant. Molecular progression will be defined as a MolBL:MolFU score >95% CI of the combined ΔMolBL scores. Radiological progression is defined as a PRECISE score of 4 or 5. The study is powered to detect an association with a statistical power of 80%.

Results: Recruitment began in July 2020 (n = 62). To date, 37 participants have donated tissue for analysis.

Conclusion: We have designed and implemented a prospective, longitudinal study to evaluate the underlying molecular landscape of intermediate risk, MR-visible prostate tumours. Recruitment is ongoing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Mark Emberton serves as a consultant/educator/trainer to Sonacare Inc., Exact Imaging, Angiodynamics Inc and Profound Medical. Acknowledgements - Mark Emberton receives research support from the United Kingdom’s National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre. Caroline M Moore receives funding from the Prostate Cancer UK, Movember, the Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK and the NIHR. She receives fees for HIFU proctoring from SonaCare. She has received speaker fees from Astellas, and Jannsen. She carries out research into photodyanamic therapy supported by Spectracure. Shonit Punwani receives research support from the United Kingdom’s National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The SPIRIT schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments for the RECONCILE study.
Fig 2
Fig 2
A & B: RECONCILE participant pathway.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Schedule of RECONCILE study visits.
Fig 4
Fig 4. RECONCILE study Tissue Collection Form (eCRF).

References

    1. UK CR. Cancer screening and diagnosis statistics.
    1. Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, Taari K, Busch C, Nordling S, et al.. Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer—29-Year Follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(24):2319–29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1807801 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, et al.. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(15):1415–24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Excellence NIfHaC. NICE guideline [NG131]: Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management May 201 2019. [Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng131. - PubMed
    1. Mottet (Chair) PCV-c RCNvdB N., Briers (Patient Representative) E, De Santis M, Fanti S, Gillessen S, et al.. Willemse. EAU Prostate Cancer Guideline 2019. 2019.

Publication types

Substances

Associated data