Venous Thromboembolism after Hospital Discharge: Temporal Trends in Baseline Characteristics, Prevention, Treatment, and 90-day Outcomes
- PMID: 39419078
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791817
Venous Thromboembolism after Hospital Discharge: Temporal Trends in Baseline Characteristics, Prevention, Treatment, and 90-day Outcomes
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hospital discharge poses a serious health risk. Assessments of patient characteristics, prophylaxis, treatment, outcomes, and over time changes lack consistency. Data on 16,901 hospitalized patients in the Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbolica registry (2003-2022) were analyzed to evaluate trends in baseline characteristics, prophylaxis, treatments, and 90-day outcomes among medical (6,218) and surgical (10,683) patient cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the risks of the composite of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) or recurrent VTE and major bleeding. The proportion of patients who presented with PE increased among medical (from 54 to 72%) and surgical patients (from 55 to 58%). Prophylaxis use increased in medical patients (from 53 to 71%), while decreasing in surgical patients (from 67 to 58%). Notably, the 90-day composite of fatal PE or recurrent VTE decreased in medical (from 3.9 to 1.8%) and surgical patients (from 2.9 to 1.2%; p < 0.001 for both). Conversely, major bleeding increased (3.1 to 4.5%) in medical patients (p = 0.008), with no change in surgical patients (from 2.5 to 2.4%). Risk-adjusted analysis showed a yearly decrease in the risk for the composite outcome (subhazard ratio [sHR]: 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-0.98) in medical and surgical patients and an increase in the risk for major bleeding in medical patients only (sHR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07). Results were consistent after excluding coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Over 20 years, the composite of fatal PE or recurrent VTE within 90 days had significantly decreased in VTE patients after hospitalization for medical or surgical care. Medical patients, however, exhibited an increase in major bleeding.
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
B.B. declares receiving honoraria for lectures and advisory board contributions from Sanofi, ROVI Laboratories, Johnson & Johnson, and HORIBA Medical. B.B. is supported by a Career Development Award from the American Heart Association and VIVA Physicians (#938814). B.B. was supported by the Scott Schoen and Nancy Adams IGNITE Award and is supported by the Mary Ann Tynan Research Scientist award from the Mary Horrigan Connors Center for Women's Health and Gender Biology at Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Heart and Vascular Center Junior Faculty Award from Brigham and Women's Hospital. B.B. reports that he was a consulting expert, on behalf of the plaintiff, for litigation related to two specific brand models of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. B.B. has not been involved in the litigation in 2022 to 2024 nor has he received any compensation in 2022 to 2024. B.B. reports that he is a member of the Medical Advisory Board for the North American Thrombosis Forum and serves in the Data Safety and Monitory Board of the NAIL-IT trial funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and Translational Sciences. B.B. is a collaborating consultant with the International Consulting Associates and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in a study to generate knowledge about utilization, predictors, retrieval, and safety of IVC filters. Other authors disclose no potential conflict of interest.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
