Association between clinician team segregation, receipt of cardiovascular care and outcomes in valvular heart diseases

Abstract

Aims: Racial disparities exist in clinical outcomes for valvular heart disease (VHD). It is unknown whether clinician segregation contributes to these disparities. Among an adequately insured population, we evaluated the relationship between clinician segregation in a hospital and receipt of care by a cardiologist according to patient race. We also evaluated the association between clinician segregation, race and care by a cardiologist on 30-day readmission and 1-year survival.

Methods and results: Using Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM, US commercial and Medicare beneficiaries) from 2010 to 2018, we identified patients with a primary diagnosis of VHD. Hospitals were categorized into low, medium and high segregation groups (SG), according to clinician segregation index (SI). SI can range from 0-1 (0: the ratio of Black to White patients is the same for all clinicians; 1: each clinician treats only Black or only White patients). Outcomes were analysed using generalized linear mixed effect models. Among 8649 patients [median age 75 (67-82), 45.4% female, 16.1% Black, 83.9% White], odds of care from a cardiologist did not vary across race for all SGs [Low SG adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.79 (95% CI: 0.58-1.08), P = 0.14; Medium SG aOR: 0.86 (95% CI: 0.60-1.25), P = 0.43; High SG aOR: 1.07 (95% CI: 0.68-1.69), P = 0.76]. Among those that received care from a cardiologist, there was no difference in the 30-day readmission between Black and White patients across SGs [Low SG aOR: 1.05 (95% CI: 0.83-1.31), P = 0.70; Medium SG aOR: 1.22 (95% CI: 0.92-1.61), P = 0.17; High SG aOR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.57-1.17), P = 0.27]. Among patients that did not receive care from a cardiologist, Black patients in low SG had higher odds of 30-day readmission compared to White patients [aOR: 2.74 (95%CI:1.38-5.43), P < 0.01]. Odds of 1-year survival were similar across race for all SG irrespective of receipt of care from a cardiologist [seen by a cardiologist: Low SG aOR: 1.13 (95% CI: 0.86-1.48), P = 0.38; Medium SG aOR: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.59-1.17), P = 0.29; High SG aOR: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.66-1.52), P = 0.98; not seen by a cardiologist: Low SG aOR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.23-1.34), P = 0.19; Medium SG aOR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.28-2.37), P = 0.70; High SG aOR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.23-1.74), P = 0.37].

Conclusions: Among an insured population, race was not associated with care by a cardiologist for VHD or survival. Black patients not seen by cardiologists had higher odds of 30-day readmission in low clinician SG.

Keywords: cardiovascular diseases; health equity; quality of care; racial disparities; segregation index; structural racism.

Figure 1

Adjusted odds ratio of receiving care from a cardiologist according to hospital segregation groups. The logistic regression model included effect of race, SG, interaction of race (Black and White) and SG (low, medium and high), gender, Charlson co‐morbidity index (with age), hospital region (Midwest, Northeast and South) and a random hospital intercept.

Figure 2

Adjusted odds ratio of 30‐day readmission in VHD according to the receipt of care from a cardiologist and hospital SG. There are separate panels for those not seen by cardiologists and those seen by a cardiologist. The logistic regression model included the effect of receipt of care by a cardiologist, two‐ and three‐way interactions of care by cardiologist, SG and race.

Figure 3

Adjusted odds ratio of 1‐year survival in VHD according to the receipt of care from a cardiologist and hospital SG. There are separate panels for those not seen by cardiologists and those seen by a cardiologist. The logistic regression model included the effect of receipt of care by a cardiologist, two‐ and three‐way interactions of care by cardiologist, SG and race.