Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 17;5(1):e70025.
doi: 10.1002/deo2.70025. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Propofol-alone sedative efficacy in observational biliopancreatic endoscopic ultrasound

Affiliations

Propofol-alone sedative efficacy in observational biliopancreatic endoscopic ultrasound

Hisaki Kato et al. DEN Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Appropriate sedative and analgesic selection is essential to reduce patient discomfort and body movement to safely conduct endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). However, few cases have examined sedation with propofol in EUS, and few studies the need for combined analgesia. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the usefulness and safety of propofol without analgesics for sedation in biliopancreatic observational EUS.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 516 observational biliopancreatic EUS procedures using propofol alone performed between April 2021 and March 2023. The primary and secondary endpoints were the observational biliopancreatic EUS results obtained with propofol alone and adverse event occurrence, respectively.

Results: The median examination time and total propofol dose were 22 (range: 10-67) min and 186.5 (range: 50-501) mg, respectively. The median starting Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and Visual Analog Scale scores were -5 (range: -5-1) and 0 (range: 0-10), respectively. The median recovery time was 22 (range: 5-80) min. Adverse events occurred in 60 (11.6%) patients. Trainee-performed examination (odds ratio [OR] 3.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63-7.60, p = 0.0014) and examination length (>22 min; OR 1.67, 95% CI: 0.95-2.92, p = 0.07) were risk factors for adverse events.High body mass index (OR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.10-3.16, p = 0.02) and extended examination time (OR 4.23, 95% CI: 2.08-8. 57, p < 0.001) were risk factors for delayed recovery.

Conclusions: During observational biliopancreatic EUS, propofol is useful as a single sedative and offers high patient satisfaction and relative safety.

Keywords: analgesics; endoscopic ultrasonography; propofol; sedative; sedative efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Haruhiro Inoue, who received grants from the Olympus Corporation and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, is an advisor for Olympus Corporation and Top Corporation. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The selection of patients who underwent observational biliopancreatic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).

References

    1. Cohen LB, Ladas SD, Vargo JJ et al. Sedation in digestive endoscopy: The Athens international position statements. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 425–442. - PubMed
    1. Cohen LB, Delegge MH, Aisenberg J et al. AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 675–701. - PubMed
    1. Dietrich CF. Endosonography as theme of this issue–Update of endoscopic ultrasound techniques. Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46: 553–554 - PubMed
    1. Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Schreiber F et al. Non‐anesthesiologist administration of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates Guideline―Updated June 2015. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 1175–1189. - PubMed
    1. Uksel O, Parlak E, Koklu S et al. Conscious sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Midazolam or midazolam plus meperidine? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19: 1002–1006. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources