Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 26;15(11):3695-3703.
doi: 10.1039/d4md00546e. Online ahead of print.

Hydrophobic CPP/HDO conjugates: a new frontier in oligonucleotide-warheaded PROTAC delivery

Affiliations

Hydrophobic CPP/HDO conjugates: a new frontier in oligonucleotide-warheaded PROTAC delivery

Miyako Naganuma et al. RSC Med Chem. .

Abstract

Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) have emerged as a potent strategy for inducing targeted degradation of proteins, offering promising therapeutic potential to treat diseases such as cancer. However, oligonucleotide-based PROTACs face significant delivery challenges because of their anionic nature and chemical instability. To address these issues, we developed a novel hydrophobic cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) and heteroduplex oligonucleotide (HDO)-conjugated PROTAC, CPP/HDO-PROTAC, to enhance intracellular delivery and degradation efficiency. CPP/HDO-PROTAC was designed to enter the cell through the activity of the conjugated hydrophobic CPP and release decoy oligonucleotide-based PROTACs by RNase H-mediated RNA strand breaks. Our findings demonstrated that CPP/HDO-PROTAC binds to the estrogen receptor α (ERα) with higher affinity than previous constructs, significantly degrades ERα in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells and inhibits cell proliferation at 10 μM. This research highlights the potential of CPP/HDO-PROTAC as a viable method for delivering and activating decoy oligonucleotide-based PROTACs within cells, overcoming the limitations of traditional transfection methods and paving the way for their clinical application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. (A) Schematic of the CPP/HDO-PROTAC responsible for degrading ERα. (B) Detailed sequence of the CPP/HDO-PROTAC.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Decoy-warheaded PROTACs and related molecules used in this study.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthesis of (A) LCL-HDO-F and (B) P4-HDO-R.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Evaluation of HDO cleavage by RNase H. CPP/HDO-PROTAC, LCL-HDO, LCL-HDO-F, P4-HDO-R, LCL-HDOdna and ER(dec)-R were incubated with RNase H for 2 h. Full-length and digested oligonucleotides were resolved on 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gels.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Degradation of ERα by the synthesized PROTACs. Whole-cell lysates were analyzed by western blotting with the indicated antibodies (representative data are shown). The numbers below the ERα panels represent the ERα/β-actin ratios, normalized by designating the expression using the vehicle control (condition without a PROTAC) as 100%. (a) Degradation of ERα by CPP/HDO-PROTAC. MCF-7 cells were treated for 24 h with the indicated concentrations of CPP/HDO-PROTAC and LCL-HDOdna. (b) Degradation of ERα by LCL-ER(dec). MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected for 24 h with the indicated concentrations of LCL-ER(dec). An LCL-ER(dec) + P4 mixture or P4 alone was added to MCF-7 cells for 24 h.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Effects of CPP/HDO-PROTAC on the proliferation of ERα-positive breast cancer cells. Growth inhibition of ERα-positive breast cancer cells by CPP/HDO-PROTAC. MCF-7 cells were treated with 1–10 μM of CPP/HDO-PROTAC or LCL-HDOdna for 72 h, and cell proliferation was then evaluated using a cell viability assay. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation (n = 5).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Fluorescence microscopy images of MCF-7 cells treated with 10 μM decoy for 2 h. Nuclei and endosomes/lysosomes were stained by Hoechst 33342 and LysoTracker Red, respectively. The fluorescent microscopy observations were performed with a 100× objective lens. Scale bar: 20 μm.

References

    1. Li K. Crews C. M. PROTACs: past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022;51(12):5214–5236. doi: 10.1039/D2CS00193D. doi: 10.1039/D2CS00193D. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang W. He S. Dong G. Sheng C. Nucleic-Acid-Based Targeted Degradation in Drug Discovery. J. Med. Chem. 2022;65(15):10217–10232. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00875. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00875. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu Y. Qian X. Ran C. Li L. Fu T. Su D. Xie S. Tan W. Aptamer-Based Targeted Protein Degradation. ACS Nano. 2023;17(7):6150–6164. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c10379. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c10379. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu J. Chen H. Kaniskan H. U. Xie L. Chen X. Jin J. Wei W. Y. TF-PROTACs Enable Targeted Degradation of Transcription Factors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143(23):8902–8910. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c03852. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c03852. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yan Y. Shao J. Ding D. Pan Y. Tran P. Yan W. Wang Z. Li H. Y. Huang H. 3-Aminophthalic acid, a new cereblon ligand for targeted protein degradation by O'PROTAC. Chem. Commun. 2022;58(14):2383–2386. doi: 10.1039/d1cc06525d. doi: 10.1039/D1CC06525D. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed