Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Dec 16;30(24):5540-5547.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1562.

Phase Ib Study of the Immunocytokine Simlukafusp Alfa (FAP-IL2v) in Combination with Cetuximab in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase Ib Study of the Immunocytokine Simlukafusp Alfa (FAP-IL2v) in Combination with Cetuximab in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Aaron R Hansen et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: This phase Ib trial evaluated fibroblast activation protein-α-targeted IL2 variant (FAP-IL2v), a novel immunocytokine engineered to minimize CD25-mediated toxicities, in combination with cetuximab, in patients with recurrent, unresectable, or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Patients and methods: Patients received FAP-IL2v either on a continuous weekly (QW) schedule or QW for 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks (Q2W). Cetuximab was dosed at QW or Q2W schedules. The primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity for the combination of FAP-IL2v with cetuximab. Exploratory objectives included pharmacodynamic analyses.

Results: A total of 58 patients were enrolled, 19 patients into the dose-escalation part, and 39 patients into the expansion part. The maximum tolerated dose of FAP-IL2v was defined as 10 mg (QW/Q2W) in combination with cetuximab (500 mg/m2, Q2W), which was further tested in the expansion part. The most common FAP-IL2v-related adverse events with a grade 3 or 4 severity were hypophosphatemia (19%), lymphopenia (16%), and infusion-related reaction (14%). The pharmacokinetics of FAP-IL2v in combination with cetuximab was similar to that after administration as monotherapy. Consistent with the proposed mode of action, FAP-IL2v preferentially expanded intratumoral NK and CD8 T cells. Four patients achieved a partial response, and the objective response rate was 7% (95% confidence interval, 3.2-14.7).

Conclusions: The safety profile of FAP-IL2v in combination with cetuximab was acceptable, and pharmacodynamic markers support the proposed mode of action of this combination, but the overall low antitumor activity does not warrant further clinical exploration in HNSCC. [Part C of Study BP29842 (NCT02627274).].

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.R. Hansen reports personal fees from Astellas and Bayer; grants from Aveo, MSD, Eisai, AdvanCell, Seagen, Tyra Biosciences, Pfizer, and Janssen; and grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb outside the submitted work. C.A. Gomez-Roca reports grants from Roche/Genentech during the conduct of the study, as well as personal fees from Regeneron Therapeutics, Pharmamar, and Macomics; personal fees and nonfinancial support from Pierre Fabre and Roche/Genentech; and nonfinancial support from MSD, Pharmamar, and Macomics outside the submitted work. D.G.J. Robbrecht reports personal fees from MSD, J&J, Astellas, and AstraZeneca and grants and personal fees from Merck AG outside the submitted work. L. Verlingue reports other support from RESOLVED; personal fees from ADAPTHERAPY; grants from Bristol Myers Squibb; and nonfinancial support from Servier and Pierre Fabre outside the submitted work. A. Italiano reports grants and personal fees from Bayer, Roche, MSD, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca; grants from Novartis and Genentech; and nonfinancial support from Pfizer outside the submitted work. J.E. Bauman reports grants from Roche during the conduct of the study, as well as personal fees and other support from Bluedot Bio and grants from Aveo, BioNTech, Celldex, CUE, and Moderna outside the submitted work. N. Steeghs reports grants from Roche during the conduct of the study; in addition, N. Steeghs provided consultation or attended advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ellipses Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, and Incyte and received research grants from AbbVie, Actuate Therapeutics, Amgen, Anaveon, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CellCentric, Cogent Biosciences, Crescendo Biologics, Deciphera, Exelixis, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, IDRx, Immunocore, Incyte, Janssen, Kling Biotherapeutics, Lixte, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merus, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Pfizer, Revolution Medicines, Roche, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, and Zentalis (all payments to the Netherlands Cancer Institute) outside the submitted work. H. Prenen reports personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Merck, Biocartis, and Amgen outside the submitted work. J. Fayette reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Roche during the conduct of the study, as well as personal fees and nonfinancial support from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Merck, and Merus and personal fees from Innate, Seagen, and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. J. Spicer reports other support from Epsilogen Ltd., Avacta Ltd., and APOBEC Discovery Ltd. and grants from Achilles, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, IO Biotech, MSD, Roche, RS Oncology, Starpharma, APOBEC Discovery Ltd., Avacta Ltd., Bristol Myers Squibb, and Roche during the conduct of the study, as well as assistance with attendance at international meetings: Starpharma MSD. J. Niu reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Sanofi, Horizon CME, and The Arizona Clinical Oncology Society outside the submitted work. C. Habigt reports nonfinancial support from Christian Seitz, PhD, during the conduct of the study and is a Roche employee with stock options who received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche. S. Evers reports other support from F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG during the conduct of the study, as well as other support from F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG outside the submitted work; in addition, S. Evers is a Roche shareholder. N. Sleiman reports other support from Roche during the conduct of the study. D. Dejardin reports other support from Roche during the conduct of the study, as well as other support from Roche outside the submitted work. C. Ardeshir reports other support from Roche Products Ltd. during the conduct of the study. D. Schmid reports employment with Roche. C. Boetsch reports personal fees from F. Hofmann La Roche during the conduct of the study, as well as personal fees from F. Hofmann La Roche outside the submitted work. J. Charo reports Roche stocks or stock options. A. Kraxner reports employment with and stock options in Hoffmann-La Roche. V. Teichgräber reports other support from Roche during the conduct of the study, as well as other support from Roche outside the submitted work. N. Keshelava reports employment with Roche Glycart. M.R. Bonomi reports grants from Roche during the conduct of the study, as well as grants from Regeneron and personal fees from Merck outside the submitted work. No disclosures were reported by the other author.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Antitumor activity results based on RECIST 1.1. Best change in target lesions from baseline by CPI status (experienced vs. naïve) in patients (A) with prior cetuximab treatment (n = 32) and (B) without prior cetuximab treatment (n = 20). C, Swimlane plot for response over time by primary tumor type (oropharyngeal vs. non-oropharyngeal tumor) and CPI experience (CPI-experienced vs. -naïve). The number of patients with a primary tumor in the oropharynx was 26, whereas 26 patients had a non-oropharyngeal primary tumor, and for five patients, the primary tumor was unknown. Baseline PD-L1 status determined using Ventana SP142 assay and immune cell/IC or tumor cell/TC staining (PD-L1 negativity defined as IC0 TC0). In the waterfall plots, * denotes patients whose initial response was not confirmed at the subsequent tumor assessment. BOR, best overall response; CPI, checkpoint inhibitor, exp., experienced; Ext, extension; L, local; M, metastatic; NA, not available; NE, not evaluable; N, negative; P, positive; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; SLD, sum of the longest diameters.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Pharmacodynamic changes assessed with focus on patients who received a FAP-IL2 dose of 10 mg QW/Q2W. A, Immune cell expansion (NK, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and Treg cells) measured in peripheral blood collected at baseline and various post-baseline timepoints. B, Immune cell infiltration density of the tumor microenvironment (CD3+ and CD8+ T cells, proliferating CD8+ T cells, cytotoxic T and NK cells, and Treg cells), PD-L1 expression in immune and tumor cells, and EGFR expression in tumor cells, measured in tumor tissue from biopsies taken at baseline and on-treatment (C2D10). For these exploratory analyses, a greater than 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions was considered a response. ABS, absolute count; BL, baseline; C, cycle; D, day, NR, nonresponder; R, responder.

References

    1. Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, Soulières D, Tahara M, de Castro G, et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2019;394:1915–28. - PubMed
    1. Eli Lilly and Company . Cetuximab prescribing information. [cited 2023 Dec]. Available from:https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/125084s277s280....
    1. Sharon S, Bell RB. Immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a narrative review. Front Oral Maxillofac Med 2022;4:28. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Waldhauer I, Gonzalez-Nicolini V, Freimoser-Grundschober A, Nayak TK, Fahrni L, Hosse RJ, et al. Simlukafusp alfa (FAP-IL2v) immunocytokine is a versatile combination partner for cancer immunotherapy. MAbs 2021;13:1913791. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu R, Li H, Liu L, Yu J, Ren X. Fibroblast activation protein: a potential therapeutic target in cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 2012;13:123–9. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data