Cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) - A systematic review of the literature
- PMID: 39425982
- DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2024.2414783
Cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) - A systematic review of the literature
Erratum in
-
Correction.Gynecol Endocrinol. 2024 Dec;40(1):2421081. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2024.2421081. Epub 2024 Oct 28. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2024. PMID: 39463125 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) stimulates ovaries to block the premature surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) by using micronized progesterone or a progestin during the follicular phase instead of the conventional gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues or GnRH antagonists downregulating LH to obtain multi-follicle engagement. Current work aims to assess the influence of progestogen treatment on ovarian stimulation and the ability to control LH surge, its efficacy and suitability in retrieving oocytes, without affecting the embryo quality and its benefit among infertile women long-term outcomes on children compared to standard stimulation protocols. Materials and Methods: The literature review used the randomized control trials published in the Pubmed database from January 2015 to April 2021. To generate the citation list, the following keywords were used: 'progestin-primed ovarian stimulation', 'PPOS', 'micronized progesterone', 'medroxyprogesterone', and/or 'dydrogesterone'. The selected articles analyzed the cohort, intervention, and scheme of the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) used in Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART). Results: Overall we concluded that PPOS for IVF/ICSI in ART results in a higher number of obtained embryos, lower incidence of OHSS, equal duration of stimulation, number of retrieved oocytes, and number of MII oocytes. It is also suggested that long-term safety in children shows no significant difference between the study and control groups. Conclusions: Despite the outcomes of progestin stimulation cycles among all cohorts, we concluded that poor ovarian responders, patients with PCOS, women of advanced age and oocyte donors benefit the most from using PPOS.
Keywords: ICSI; IVF; PPOS; Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation; dydrogesterone; medroxyprogesterone; micronized progesterone.
Similar articles
-
New application of dydrogesterone as a part of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a randomized controlled trial including 516 first IVF/ICSI cycles.Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):229-237. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex367. Hum Reprod. 2018. PMID: 29300975 Clinical Trial.
-
Ovarian response and embryo ploidy following oral micronized progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol. A prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles.Hum Reprod. 2024 May 2;39(5):1098-1104. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae047. Hum Reprod. 2024. PMID: 38498835
-
Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol versus Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Protocol in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Ovarian Response.Curr Med Sci. 2019 Jun;39(3):431-436. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2055-x. Epub 2019 Jun 17. Curr Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 31209815
-
Efficacy of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 19;14:1224858. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1224858. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37795363 Free PMC article.
-
Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol for Patients in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 31;12:702558. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.702558. eCollection 2021. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34531825 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparing Dydrogesterone Versus Medroxyprogesterone in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) for Patients Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2025 Jun 13;17(6):e85959. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85959. eCollection 2025 Jun. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40524846 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous