Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 19;14(1):24545.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76209-z.

Expression of c-erb-B2 oncoprotein as a neoantigen strategy to repurpose anti-neu antibody therapy in a model of melanoma

Affiliations

Expression of c-erb-B2 oncoprotein as a neoantigen strategy to repurpose anti-neu antibody therapy in a model of melanoma

Emmanuel M Gabriel et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In this study, we tested a novel approach of "repurposing" a biomarker typically associated with breast cancer for use in melanoma. HER2/neu is a well characterized biomarker in breast cancer for which effective anti-HER2/neu therapies are readily available. We constructed a lentivirus encoding c-erb-B2, an animal (rat) homolog to HER2/neu. This was used to transfect B16 melanoma in vitro for use in an orthotopic preclinical mouse model, which resulted in expression of rat c-erb-B2 as a neoantigen target for anti-c-erb-B2 monoclonal antibody (7.16.4). The c-erb-B2-expressing melanoma was designated B16/neu. 7.16.4 produced statistically significant in vivo anti-tumor responses against B16/neu. This effect was mediated by NK-cell antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. To further model human melanoma (which expresses < 5% HER2/neu), our c-erb-B2 encoding lentivirus was used to inoculate naïve (wild-type) B16 tumors in vivo, resulting in successful c-erb-B2 expression. When combined with 7.16.4, anti-tumor responses were again demonstrated where approximately 40% of mice treated with c-erb-B2 lentivirus and 7.16.4 achieved complete clinical response and long-term survival. For the first time, we demonstrated a novel strategy to repurpose c-erb-B2 as a neoantigen target for melanoma. Our findings are particularly significant in the contemporary setting where newer anti-HER2/neu antibody-drug therapies have shown increased efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) pLenti6.3 c-erb-B2 construct showing the insertion of the rat c-erb-B2 (neu) gene into the lentivirus DNA. The c-erb-B2-expressing B16 melanoma cell line was designated B16/neu. c-erb-B2 expression by B16/neu was confirmed by qPCR (B), Western blot (C), and flow cytometry (D), which altogether showed high levels (> 95%) of c-erb-B2 transcription and surface expression by the newly created B16/neu cell line. In contrast, naïve or wild-type B16 showed only about 1% c-erb-B2 expression. (E) The oncogenic variant of c-erb-B2 was inserted into pLenti6.3 and confirmed through gene sequencing, which demonstrated a valine to glutamine mutation. The oncogenic variant differs from wild-type c-erb-B2, which contains valine at this position.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Naïve B16 and B16/neu were grown in vitro, and cell viability was assessed via the Cyquant assay. Overall, B16/neu showed higher cell viability at all time points compared to naïve B16. When the anti-c-erb-B2 monoclonal antibody 7.16.4 was added in increasing doses to B16/neu, no statistically significant effects were observed on cell growth at any of the tested doses.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) 7.16.4 generated statistically significant responses on B16/neu growth compared to B16 and isotype (IgG2a) controls. The bar shows statistical significance between the two groups of particular interest: (1) B16/neu + 7.16.4 and (2) Naïve (wild-type) B16 + 7.16.4. (B) Survival was also significantly improved with 5/12 (41.2%) of C57BL/6 mice bearing B16/neu tumors achieving a complete clinical response and long-term survival. Numbers at risk are shown. Mice that achieved complete clinical response (cure) were euthanized at day 90.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
We hypothesized that 7.16.4 generated anti-tumor responses via NK-cell antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The addition of anti-NK cell monoclonal antibody (NK1.1) inhibited and essentially reversed the anti-tumor effects of 7.16.4 on both tumor growth (A) and survival (B). In (A), the bar shows statistical significance between the two groups of particular interest: (1) mice that received 7.16.4, which had the lowest tumor growth and (2) mice that received 7.16.4 + NK1.1, which showed similar growth to the negative control group and the NK1.1 control. In (B), complete response was again obtained for 4/12 mice treated with 7.16.4 alone. These mice were euthanized at day 90 post-tumor inoculation. Resected tumors from mice treated with NK1.1 showed little to no presence of NK cells on immunohistochemistry (C). In contrast, tumors resected from non-responders treated with only 7.16.4 showed a significantly higher number of stained NK cells on tumor sections (D), providing pathological evidence that NK1.1 effectively eliminated NK cells from infiltrating into B16/neu tumors. IHC staining of NK cells within naïve spleens (obtained from non-tumor bearing C57BL/6 mice) was used as a control (E).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Naïve (wild-type) B16 tumors were inoculated with pLenti6.3 c-erb-B2 to generate c-erb-B2 as a neoantigen target for 7.16.4 in vivo. The addition of 7.16.4 to pLenti6.3 c-erb-B2 resulted in statistically significant decreased tumor growth (A) and improved long-term survival (B), again with 41.2% of mice showing complete clinical response (mice euthanized at day 90). In (A), the bar shows statistical significance between the two groups of particular interest: (1) naïve B16 + pLenti6.3 c-erb-B2 and (2) naïve B16 + pLenti6.3 c-erb-B2 + 7.16.4.

Update of

References

    1. Hodi, F. S. et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 711–723. 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466 (2010). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ribas, A. et al. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 16, 908–918. 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00083-2 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robert, C. et al. Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 2521–2532. 10.1056/NEJMoa1503093 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Wolchok, J. D. et al. Overall survival with combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 1345–1356. 10.1056/NEJMoa1709684 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marei, H. E., Hasan, A., Pozzoli, G. & Cenciarelli, C. Cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): potential, mechanisms of resistance, and strategies for reinvigorating T cell responsiveness when resistance is acquired. Cancer Cell Int. 23, 64. 10.1186/s12935-023-02902-0 (2023). - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources