Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Feb;25(2):117-121.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.09.012. Epub 2024 Sep 26.

Maximizing Breast Cancer Detection Through Screening: A Comparative Analysis of Imaging-Based Approaches

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Maximizing Breast Cancer Detection Through Screening: A Comparative Analysis of Imaging-Based Approaches

Matthew F Covington. Clin Breast Cancer. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction/background: This study estimates the percentage of detectable breast cancers in the screening population that could be found with primary and supplemental screening, and provides cost estimates for population wide supplemental screening in the U.S.

Materials and methods: Published estimates on cancer detection rates of 2D mammography, tomosynthesis (DBT), whole breast ultrasound (US), molecular breast imaging (MBI), contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), and MRI, the number of mammograms conducted in the United States in 2023, and the proportion of dense breast tissue, were utilized. The maximum number of detectable cancers was projected from incremental cancer detection rates of the most sensitive supplemental screening method. The proportion of cancers detectable for each modality was calculated. In 2023, Medicare reimbursement rates were used to estimate supplemental screening costs.

Results: Out of 469,437 detectable cancers, 2D mammography could detect 190,531 (41%), leaving 278,906 undetected. Adding supplemental screening could detect a combined 220,165 cancers (47%) with DBT, 237,596 (51%) with US, 331,727 (71%) with MBI, 377,049 (80%) with CEM and 469,437 (100%) with MRI. The imaging cost in US dollars to provide supplemental screening to all individuals with dense breasts in 2023 was $933M for tomosynthesis, $1.84B for US, $3.87B for CEM, $4.16B for MBI, and $6.36B for MRI.

Conclusion: The study highlights potential benefits from supplemental breast cancer screening, suggesting the combination of mammography and breast MRI offers the most effective detection method though at the highest imaging cost. These findings provide valuable insights to guide future research and inform decision-making in supplemental breast cancer screening strategies.

Keywords: Breast cancer screening; Breast density; Breast imaging; Dense breast tissue; Supplemental screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The study author(s) make the following disclosures: GE Healthcare, Advisory Board NexEos, Consultant Invicro, Consultant 5 For the Fight Research Funding Fujifilm USA Institutional Research Funding Bayer Institutional Research Funding Lantheus Research Funding Kindle Direct Publishing Royalties

Publication types

MeSH terms