Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 1;20(3):199-204.
doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000830. Epub 2024 Oct 21.

Exploring the Meta-debrief: Developing a Toolbox for Debriefing the Debrief

Affiliations

Exploring the Meta-debrief: Developing a Toolbox for Debriefing the Debrief

Prashant Kumar et al. Simul Healthc. .

Abstract

Otherwise known as debriefing the debrief, meta-debriefing describes the practice of debriefing simulation facilitators after they have facilitated, or observed, a debriefing. It is a vital component of enhancing debriefing skills, irrespective of where debriefers may be in terms of their professional development journey from novice to expert. We present the following 4 fundamental pillars, which underpin the creation of an impactful meta-debriefing strategy: theoretically driven, psychologically safe, context dependent, and formative in function. Furthermore, we describe various strategies that, underpinned by these 4 key pillars, contribute to a toolbox of techniques that enable meta-debriefers to develop proficiency and flexibility in their practice. We have synthesized and critically reviewed the current evidence base, derived mostly from the debriefing literature, and highlighted gaps to address in meta-debriefing contexts. We hope this article stimulates discussion among simulation practitioners, progresses the science and art of meta-debriefing, and prompts further research so that meta-debriefing can become an integral evidence-based component of our faculty development processes.

Keywords: Debriefing; debriefing the debrief; faculty development; meta-debriefing; simulation-based education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
Four pillars of meta-debriefing practice.

References

    1. Cheng A, Eppich W, Grant V, Sherbino J, Zendejas-Mummert B, Cook D. Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ 2014;48:657–666. - PubMed
    1. Cheng A, Grant V, Dieckmann P, Arora S, Robinson T, Eppich W. Faculty development for simulation programs: five issues for the future of debriefing training. Simul Healthc 2015;10:217–222. - PubMed
    1. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc 2007;2:115–125. - PubMed
    1. Shinnick MA, Woo M, Horwich TB, Steadman R. Debriefing: the most important component in simulation? Clin Simul Nurs 2011;7(3):e105–e111.
    1. Duff JP Morse KJ Seelandt J, et al. . Debriefing methods for simulation in healthcare: a systematic review. Simul Healthc 2024;19(1S):S112–S121. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources