Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 1;34(6):647-651.
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001332.

Minimally Invasive Pauli Parastomal Hernia Repair

Affiliations
Review

Minimally Invasive Pauli Parastomal Hernia Repair

Francesco Guerra et al. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. .

Abstract

Background: Although originally described as an open procedure, the application in the setting of minimally invasive surgery of the Pauli technique for parastomal hernia repair is gaining interest among surgeons owing to encouraging early results. We aimed at combining and analyzing the results of minimally invasive Pauli repair by assessing the available evidence.

Methods: A literature search in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science was undertaken to include all articles reporting on minimally invasive repair of parastomal hernias using the Pauli technique.

Results: Data regarding a total of 75 patients across 11 articles published between 2019 and 2023 were included. Patients received surgery either by a laparoscopic (27%) or robotic (73%) approach. A transabdominal route was chosen in 62 patients (83%), while an extraperitoneal technique was employed in the remaining 13 patients. The rate of postoperative morbidity was 34%, with 10% being the incidence of grade >II complications. The reported overall rate of recurrence was 7% at a median follow-up of 1 to 43 months.

Conclusions: The available evidence derived from a growing number of centers suggests that minimally invasive Pauli repair is a viable option to treat parastomal hernias. Despite robust, high-level data still lacking, preliminary experiences indicate promising results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

F.G. and A.C. report consultancy fees as proctors for robotic surgery on behalf of Ab Medica, Italy. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Fleming AM, Phillips AL, Drake JA, et al. Sugarbaker versus keyhole repair for parastomal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;27:573–584.
    1. Okorji LM, Kasten KR. Diagnosis and management of parastomal hernias. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62:158–162.
    1. Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia. 2018;22:183–198.
    1. DeAsis FJ, Lapin B, Gitelis ME, et al. Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:8670–8677.
    1. Dewulf M, Dietz UA, Montgomery A, et al. Robotic hernia surgery IV. English version: robotic parastomal hernia repair. Video report and preliminary results. Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022;93:129–140.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources