Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 19;9(3):owae046.
doi: 10.1093/fsr/owae046. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Application and implications of radiocarbon dating in forensic case work: when medico-legal significance meets archaeological relevance

Affiliations

Application and implications of radiocarbon dating in forensic case work: when medico-legal significance meets archaeological relevance

Benoit Bertrand et al. Forensic Sci Res. .

Abstract

The estimation of the postmortem interval for skeletal remains is a crucial aspect of forensic anthropology. This paper illustrates the importance of radiocarbon analysis for establishing medico-legal significance and supporting forensic identification, through the analysis of three case studies for which the years of both birth and death were investigated. In Audresselles, Northern France, a partial skull was discovered with no contextual information or identity. Radiocarbon dating yielded an average calibrated calendar age of 4232 BCE (92.5% probability), indicating significant archaeological value but no forensic relevance. In the second case, skeletal remains were found in the flooded underground of a historical fort at Wimereux, Northern France, also with no identity. Radiocarbon dating based on the bomb-pulse curve indicated a calibrated date of death in 1962 CE (37.3% probability) or 1974-1975 CE (58.1% probability), both surpassing the French statute of limitations. Lastly, a skeleton with a suspected identity was discovered near Valenciennes, Northern France, and various biological tissues underwent radiocarbon dating. A bone sample suggested a calibrated date of death of 1998-2002 CE (84.6% probability), differing from a hair sample (2013-2018 CE, 83.3% probability) because of the slower bone tissue remodeling process. DNA analysis confirmed the person's identity, reported missing a decade prior to the discovery of the remains, following the alignment of the radiocarbon results with the individual's year of birth based on dental tissues and year of death. These case studies reveal that traditional radiocarbon dating and bomb-pulse dating are essential tools for estimating the postmortem interval, providing mutual benefits for archaeologists, forensic anthropologists, and the criminal justice system.

Key points: Traditional radiocarbon dating and bomb-pulse dating are essential tools to establish the archaeological relevance or medico-legal significance of human skeletal remains.Bomb-pulse dating enables assessment of an individual's years of birth and death.Bomb-pulse dating helps to narrow down the pool of candidates for identification.Radiocarbon analysis provides mutual benefits for archaeologists, forensic anthropologists, and the criminal justice system.

Keywords: 14C; bomb-pulse dating; forensic anthropology; identification; postmortem interval.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cranial remains discovered on the beach at Audresselles (France) with no contextual information.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Calibrated dates obtained for the sample from Audresselles (France) using the IntCal20 calibration curve [43]. BCE: before the common era.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Skeletal remains discovered at Wimereux (France).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Calibrated dates obtained for the sample from Wimereux (France) using the Bomb21NH1 bomb-pulse calibration curve [43,47]. CE: common era.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Skull discovered near Valenciennes (France). (A) Left lateral view showing root etching and staining. (B) Anterior view. (C) Right lateral view. (D) Posterior view. (E) Inferior view. (F) Superior view. (G) Left lateral view of the skull showing colonization by moss. (H) Taphonomic alterations, showing gnaw marks in the tibia. (I) Taphonomic alterations, showing gnaw marks in the rib.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Calibrated dates for the samples from Valenciennes (France) using the Bomb21NH1 bomb-pulse calibration curve [43,47]. CE: common era.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bonicelli A, Mickleburgh HL, Chighine A, et al. . The “ForensOMICS” approach for postmortem interval estimation from human bone by integrating metabolomics, lipidomics, and proteomics. Elife. 2022;11:1–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saukko P, Knight B. Knight’s: forensic pathology. 4th ed. London (UK): CRC Press; 2015.
    1. Rognum TO, Holmen S, Musse MA, et al. . Estimation of time since death by vitreous humor hypoxanthine, potassium, and ambient temperature. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;262:160–165. - PubMed
    1. Stigter H, Krap T, Gelderman T, et al. . Technical note: practical application of post-mortem mechanical stimulation of skeletal muscle, a field study. Int J Leg Med. 2024;138:55–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Englisch CN, Alrefai R, Lesan CM, et al. . Postmortem sympathomimetic iris excitability. Ann Anat. 2024;254:152240. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources