Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;107(2):188-195.
doi: 10.1111/cge.14633. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

Utility of Optical Genome Mapping in Repeat Disorders

Affiliations

Utility of Optical Genome Mapping in Repeat Disorders

Mehmet Burak Mutlu et al. Clin Genet. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Genomic repeat sequences are patterns of nucleic acids that exist in multiple copies throughout the genome. More than 60 Mendelian disorders are caused by the expansion or contraction of these repeats. Various specific methods for determining tandem repeat variations have been developed. However, these methods are highly specific to the genomic region being studied and sometimes require specialized tools. In this study, we have investigated the use of Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) as a diagnostic tool for detecting repeat disorders. We evaluated 19 patients with a prediagnosis of repeat disorders and explained the molecular etiology of 9 of them with OGM (5 patients with Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD), 2 patients with Friedreich's Ataxia (FA), 1 patient with Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), and 1 patient with Progressive Myoclonic Epilepsy 1A (EPM1A)). We confirmed OGM results with more widely used fragment analysis techniques. This study highlights the utility of OGM as a diagnostic tool for repeat expansion and contraction diseases such as FA, FXS, EPM1A, and FSHD.

Keywords: Bionano; FSHD; Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy; Fragile X Syndrome; Friedreich's Ataxia; Optical Genome Mapping; Progressive Myoclonic Epilepsy 1A.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. E. Leitão, C. Schröder, and C. Depienne, “Identification and Characterization of Repeat Expansions in Neurological Disorders: Methodologies, Tools, and Strategies,” Revue Neurologique (Paris) 180, no. 5 (May 2024): 383–392, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2024.03.005.
    1. R. J. Lemmers, P. de Kievit, L. Sandkuijl, et al., “Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Is Uniquely Associated With One of the Two Variants of the 4q Subtelomere,” Nature Genetics 32, no. 2 (October 2002): 235–236, https://doi.org/10.1038/ng999.
    1. R. J. Lemmers, M. Wohlgemuth, K. J. van der Gaag, et al., “Specific Sequence Variations Within the 4q35 Region Are Associated With Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy,” American Journal of Human Genetics 81, no. 5 (November 2007): 884–894, https://doi.org/10.1086/521986.
    1. R. J. Lemmers, “Analyzing Copy Number Variation Using Pulsed‐Field Gel Electrophoresis: Providing a Genetic Diagnosis for FSHD1,” Methods in Molecular Biology 1492 (2017): 107–125, https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐1‐4939‐6442‐0_7.
    1. G. Barcia, M. Rachid, M. Magen, et al., “Pitfalls in Molecular Diagnosis of Friedreich Ataxia,” European Journal of Medical Genetics 61, no. 8 (August 2018): 455–458, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.03.004.

LinkOut - more resources