Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb;50(2):208-215.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Oct 21.

Phantom Limb Pain Management

Affiliations
Review

Phantom Limb Pain Management

Marie C Spezia et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

With an estimated 2 million major limb amputees and projections reaching 3.6 million by 2050, the increasing prevalence of limb loss in the United States underscores the importance of addressing complications associated with limb loss. Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a common and often chronic condition affecting 40% to 80% of amputees. The heterogeneous pathology of PLP encompasses cortical, spinal, and peripheral mechanisms that present a challenge to providing effective treatments. The spectrum of available treatments spans pharmacologic interventions, noninvasive modalities like mirror therapy, and surgical techniques. A review of the current body of evidence on the treatment of PLP favors novel methods of surgical management. Nonetheless, a majority of literature pushes for the evaluation of other methods of ameliorating PLP as imperative to offering patient-centered options that address the myriad of etiologies that contribute to this pathology. More extensive research, especially randomized controlled trials, is needed to establish the long-term efficacy of interventions, compare the impact of different treatments, and identify which modalities are most effective in various patient populations.

Keywords: Amputation; mirror therapy; phantom limb pain; regenerative peripheral nerve interface; targeted muscle reinnervation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest Ms Spezia was supported by a TL1 summer position funded by CTSA Grants UL1TR002345, KL2TR002346, TL1TR002344. Dr Brogan's time was supported by a NIAMS K08 grant K08AR080260-01. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received by the other author related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

References

    1. Varma P, Stineman MG, Dillingham TR. Epidemiology of Limb Loss. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25(1):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2013.09.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Urits I, Seifert D, Seats A, et al. Treatment Strategies and Effective Management of Phantom Limb-Associated Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23(9):64. doi:10.1007/s11916-019-0802-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Makin TR, Flor H. Brain (re)organisation following amputation: Implications for phantom limb pain. Neuroimage. 2020;218:116943. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116943 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Erlenwein J, Diers M, Ernst J, Schulz F, Petzke F. Clinical updates on phantom limb pain. Pain Rep. 2021;6(1):e888. doi:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000888 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andoh J, Milde C, Diers M, et al. Assessment of cortical reorganization and preserved function in phantom limb pain: a methodological perspective. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):11504. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68206-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed