Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;47(12):1604-1610.
doi: 10.1111/pace.15093. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

Voltage-Guided and Non-Voltage-Guided Superior Vena Cava Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Affiliations

Voltage-Guided and Non-Voltage-Guided Superior Vena Cava Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Jumpei Saito et al. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: In addition to the pulmonary vein, the superior vena cava (SVC) is an important focus of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, SVC isolation may cause serious complications, and appropriate settings and techniques for SVC isolation are lacking.

Methods: This study enrolled 86 consecutive patients with AF who underwent SVC isolation. Voltage mapping using a multi-electrode catheter and ablation were performed under the guidance of an electro-anatomical mapping system. The lines encircling the SVC were divided into eight anatomic segments on the SVC geometry, and each segment was subjected to voltage-guided (VG) ablation in decreasing order of voltage (starting from the segment with the highest voltage). Non-VG (NVG) ablation was performed anatomically from the anterior wall toward the septum with one-round cautery.

Results: A total of 86 cases (66 males, mean age 69 [60, 74], mean CHA2DS2 VASc score 2 [1, 3], 58 paroxysmal AF) with AF were included for ablation. Electrical SVC isolation was successfully achieved in all patients. The length of the myocardial sleeves, as measured from the SVC-RA junction to the end of the local signal, was 37 [28, 45] mm. Major axis of the RA-SVC junction was 15 [13, 17] and minor axis of the RA-SVC junction was 11 [9, 13]. The number of ablation points with VG SVC isolation was fewer than that for NVG SVC isolation (8 [5, 11.5] vs. 11.5 [8.8, 13.3]; p = 0.001). The procedure time of VG SVC isolation was greater than that of NVG SVC isolation (259 s [154, 379] vs. 167 s [115, 222]; p = 0.012). There were no significant differences in the complication rates.

Conclusions: VG SVC isolation reduced the number of ablation points compared with NVG SVC isolation.

Keywords: arrhythmia; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; left atrium; superior vena cava isolation; voltage mapping.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. M. Haissaguerre, P. Jais, D. C. Shah, et al., “Spontaneous Initiation of Atrial Fibrillation by Ectopic Beats Originating in the Pulmonary Veins,” New England Journal of Medicine 339 (1998): 659–666.
    1. M. Goya, F. Ouyang, S. Ernst, et al., “Electroanatomic Mapping and Catheter Ablation of Breakthroughs From the Right Atrium to the Superior Vena Cava in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation,” Circulation 106 (2002): 1317–1320.
    1. S. Miyazaki, M. Takigawa, S. Kusa, et al., “Role of Arrhythmogenic Superior Vena Cava on Atrial Fibrillation,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 25 (2014): 380–386.
    1. S. Miyazaki, H. Taniguchi, S. Kusa, et al., “Factors Predicting an Arrhythmogenic Superior Vena Cava in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Insight Into the Mechanism,” Heart Rhythm 11 (2014): 1560–1566.
    1. Z. Gu, G. Yang, W. Ju, et al., “Empirical Superior Vena Cava Isolation Improves Outcomes of Radiofrequency Re‐Ablation in Pulmonary Vein Isolation Non‐Responders: A 2‐Center Retrospective Study in China,” Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 9 (2022): 1049414.

LinkOut - more resources