Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 23;15(1):9114.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53561-2.

A splicing isoform of PD-1 promotes tumor progression as a potential immune checkpoint

Affiliations

A splicing isoform of PD-1 promotes tumor progression as a potential immune checkpoint

Xuetong Wang et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

The immune checkpoint receptor, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1, encoded by PDCD1), mediates the immune escape of cancer, but whether PD-1 splicing isoforms contribute to this process is still unclear. Here, we identify an alternative splicing isoform of human PD-1, which carries a 28-base pairs extension retained from 5' region of intron 2 (PD-1^28), is expressed in peripheral T cells and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. PD-1^28 expression is induced on T cells upon activation and is regulated by an RNA binding protein, TAF15. Functionally, PD-1^28 inhibits T cell proliferation, cytokine production, and tumor cell killing in vitro. In vivo, T cell-specific exogenous expression of PD-1^28 promotes tumor growth in both a syngeneic mouse tumor model and humanized NOG mice inoculated with human lung cancer cells. Our study thus demonstrates that PD-1^28 functions as an immune checkpoint, and may contribute to resistance to immune checkpoint blockade therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Identification and characterization of PD-1^28 in T lymphocytes.
A, B The schematic gene structures of PDCD1 (top) and PDCD1^28 (bottom) (A) or functional domains of PD-1 (top) and PD-1^28 (bottom) (B). C, D Immunoblot analysis (C) or silver staining (D) of endogenous immunoprecipitation of PD-1^28 in Jurkat cells treated with PHA or vehicle for 72 h. Polyclonal antibodies (PcAb). The specific band indicated by red arrow is the PD-1^28. E LC-MS analysis of specific peptides for PD-1^28 cytoplasmic tail obtained from D. F Representative confocal images of endogenous PD-1^28 (magenta) in Jurkat cells after treatment with PHA or vehicle. The cell membranes were stained with Na/K ATPase (green). The nuclei (blue) were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Scale bars, 10 µm. GL qRT-PCR analysis of PDCD1^28 (G, I, and K, left) and PDCD1 (G, I, and K, right) or FACS analysis of PD-1^28 (H, J and L, left) and PD-1 (H, J and L, right) and quantified as the MFI in Jurkat cells stimulated by CD3 and CD28 for 72 h (G, H), PMA and Ionomycin for 5 h (I and J) or PHA for 72 h (K, L) (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). M Quantified results of PD-1 and PD-1^28 populations in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from PBMCs of 3 healthy human donors. N Quantified results of PD-1^28 proportion in CD4+ and CD8+ TILs derived from 7 lung cancer clinical specimens. Data represent the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test (GJ, M) or one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test (K, L). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Source data, including exact p-values, are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Splicing of PDCD1^28 is regulated by TAF15.
A Venn diagram showing the three candidate RBPs. B qRT-PCR analysis for KD efficiency of TAF15 in Jurkat cells transfected with the indicated shRNAs. sh-Con as a negative control (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). C, D qRT-PCR analysis of PDCD1^28 (C) or representative FACS showing changes (D, left) and quantified as the MFI (D, right) of the PD-1^28 levels in TAF15 KD Jurkat cells (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). EH qRT-PCR analysis of PDCD1^28 (E, G) or quantitation of PD-1^28 levels as MFI (F, H) in FUS (E, F) or EWSR1 (G, H) KD Jurkat cells (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). IK qRT-PCR analysis for expression levels of TAF15 (I), PDCD1^28 (J), or representative FACS showing changes (K, left) and quantified as MFI of PD-1^28 (K, right) in Jurkat cells transfected with the indicated plasmids (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). L, M RIP qRT-PCR showing the enriched binding of TAF15 on the endogenous PDCD1^28 pre-mRNAs in Jurkat cells (L) or in minigene OE HEK293T cells (M) (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). N, O qRT-PCR analysis of PDCD1^28 in minigene OE HEK293T cells with TAF15 KD (N) or OE (O) (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). Data represent the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett post hoc test (BH and N) or two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test (IM and O). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Source data, including exact p-values, are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. PD-1^28 negatively regulates the immune function of Jurkat cells.
A, B qRT-PCR analysis for PDCD1^28 (A), or representative FACS (B, left), quantified as MFI (B, top right) of PD-1^28 and representative immunoblot for PD-1 (B, bottom right) in Jurkat cells transfected with the indicated shRNAs (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). C Representative CFSE assay assessing the relative proliferation (left) and quantified as the MFI (right) in PDCD1^28 KD Jurkat cells (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). D Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assessing the relative IL-2 production in PDCD1^28 KD Jurkat cells (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). E Tumor cell killing of PDCD1^28 KD Jurkat cells against NCI-H1299 cells. The representative images (left) and the quantified ratio (right) of dead cancer cells measured by Annexin-V and 7-AAD staining (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). F qRT-PCR analysis for PDCD1 and PDCD1^28 in KO-1 and KO-2 Jurkat cells transfected with the indicated plasmids (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). G Immunoblot analysis for PD-1 and PD-1^28 in KO-1 and KO-2 Jurkat cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. H Representative CFSE assay assessing the relative proliferation in KO-1 and KO-2 Jurkat cells with OE of either PDCD1 or PDCD1^28 (left). Quantification data as MFI (right) (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). I ELISA assessing the relative IL-2 production of KO-1 and KO-2 Jurkat cells with OE of either PDCD1 or PDCD1^28 (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). J Tumor cell killing of KO-1 Jurkat cells with OE of either PDCD1 or PDCD1^28 against NCI-H1299 cells. The representative images (left) and the quantified ratio (right) of dead cancer cells measured by Annexin-V and 7-AAD staining (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). K, L, O qRT-PCR analysis for either wild-type CD28 (K, left) or CD28-PDCD1^28 (K, right) and either wild-type PDCD1 or PDCD1-PDCD1^28 (O, top), and immunoblot analysis for the indicated proteins (L and bottom of O) in KO-1 cells transfected with the indicated plasmids (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). M, P Representative CFSE assay assessing the relative proliferation of KO-1 Jurkat cells with OE of either wild-type CD28 or CD28-PDCD1^28 (M, left), and either wild-type PDCD1 or PDCD1-PDCD1^28 (P, left). Quantification data as MFI (M, P, right) (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). N, Q ELISA assessing the relative IL-2 production of KO-1 Jurkat cells with OE of either wild-type CD28 or CD28-PDCD1^28 (N), and either wild-type PDCD1 or PDCD1-PDCD1^28 (Q) (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). Data represent the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett post hoc test (AF, HJ, MQ) or two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test (K). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Source data, including exact p-values, are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. PD-1^28 negatively regulates the immune function of primary T cells.
A Representative FACS (left) and quantified as MFI (right) for KD efficiency of PD-1^28 in primary T cells isolated from PBMCs transfected with the indicated shRNAs (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). B FACS assessing PD-1 surface levels and quantified as the MFI in PDCD1^28 KD primary T cells (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). C CFSE assay assessing the relative proliferation and quantified as the MFI in PDCD1^28 KD primary T cells (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). D, E FACS assessing the relative GzmB (D) and IFN-γ (E) production of PDCD1^28 KD primary T cells (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). F Tumor cell killing of PDCD1^28 KD primary T cells against NCI-H1299 cells. The representative images (left) and the quantified ratio (right) of dead cancer cells measured by Annexin-V and 7-AAD staining (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). G, H Representative FACS (left) and quantified as MFI (right) showing changes in the PD-1 (G) or PD-1^28 (H) levels of primary T cells transfection with the indicated plasmids (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). I CFSE assay assessing the relative proliferation and quantified as the MFI of primary T cells with OE of PDCD1 or PDCD1^28 (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). J, K FACS assessing the relative GzmB (J) and IFN-γ (K) production of primary T cells with OE of PDCD1 or PDCD1^28 (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). L Tumor cell killing of primary T cells with OE of PDCD1 or PDCD1^28 against NCI-H1299 cells. The representative images (left) and the quantified ratio (right) of dead cancer cells measured by Annexin-V and 7-AAD staining (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). Data represent the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett post hoc test (AF, IL) or two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test (G, H). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Source data, including exact p-values, are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. PD-1^28 binding with PD-L1 inhibits T cells activation.
A FACS analysis for PD-L1 proportion in Jurkat cells with intact or permeabilized membrane (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). B ELISA assessing the relative IL-2 production of KO-1 and KO-2 Jurkat cells transfected with the indicated plasmids and treated with either Ig or PD-L1 Ig (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). C, D qRT-PCR analysis for PDCD1LG1 (C) and immunoblot analysis of the indicated proteins (D) in KO-1 and KO-2 Jurkat cells transfected with the indicated plasmids (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). E, F CFSE assay assessing the relative proliferation and quantified as MFI (E), or ELISA assessing the relative IL-2 production (F) of KO-1 and KO-2 Jurkat cells transfected with the indicated plasmids (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). G qRT-PCR analysis for PDCD1LG1 (top) and immunoblot (bottom) in KO-1 Jurkat cells transfected with the indicated plasmids (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). H qRT-PCR analysis for wild-type PDCD1, mutant PDCD1, wild-type PDCD1^28 and mutant PDCD1^28 (top) and immunoblot (bottom) in KO-1 Jurkat cells transfected with the indicated plasmids (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). I, J Representative CFSE assay assessing the relative proliferation (I, left) and quantification data as MFI (I, right), or ELISA assessing the relative IL-2 production (J) of KO-1 Jurkat cells transfected with the indicated plasmids (n = 3 biologically independent experiments). Data represent the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test (A) or one-way ANOVA with Tukey (B, C, E, F, I, J) or Dunnett (G, H) post hoc test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Source data, including exact p-values, are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. PD-1^28 regulates T cell anti-tumor immunity in MC38 colorectal carcinoma mouse model.
A Tumor progression of MC38 colorectal carcinoma, indicated by tumor volume in mice (left) and the survival of mice (right) assessed in control and PDCD1^28CKI mice (n = 5). BH Tumor-infiltrating T cells isolated and analyzed after transplantation (n = 5). Frequencies of CD4+ T cells (B), CD8+ T cells (C), and Treg cell population (D). Quantified results of Ki-67 (E), GzmB (F), IFN-γ (G), and TNF (H) expressions of CD8+ TILs in the tumor microenvironment. IM Anti-Pd-l1 therapy against MC38 colorectal carcinoma (n = 5). Tumor volume (I), GzmB (J), IFN-γ (K), and TNF (L) expressions of CD8+ TILs and population of Treg cells (M) measured. Data represent the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test (A, left and BH), log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test (A, right), or one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test (IM). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Source data, including exact p-values, are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. PD-1^28 regulates T cell anti-tumor immunity in huPBMC-NOG mouse model.
A Experimental design of huPBMC-NOG mice model. PBMCs respectively transfected with a control and PDCD1^28. s.c., subcutaneous; i.v., intravenous. B Tumor size in control and PDCD1^28 OE huPBMC-NOG mice subcutaneously implanted with NCI-H1299 cells at the end point (n = 5). C Effects of PD-1^28 on tumor growth in subcutaneously implanted huPBMC-NOG mice (n = 5). DJ Phenotypic assessment of T cells in spleens isolated from control (n = 5) or PDCD1^28 OE huPBMC-NOG mice (n = 5). Frequency of CD4+ T cells (D), CD8+ T cells (E), and Treg cell population (F). Quantified results of Ki-67 (G), GzmB (H), IFN-γ (I), and TNF (J) expressions of CD8+ T cells in the spleen. KQ TILs of control (n = 5) and PDCD1^28 OE huPBMC-NOG mice (n = 5) isolated and analyzed after transplantation. Frequencies of CD4+ T cells (K), CD8+ T cells (L), and Treg cell population (M). Quantified results of Ki-67 (N), GzmB (O), IFN-γ (P), and TNF (Q) expressions of CD8+ TILs in the tumor microenvironment. Data represent the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test (CQ). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Source data, including exact p-values, are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Pardoll, D. M. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer12, 252–264 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nurieva, R. I., Liu, X. & Dong, C. Yin-Yang of costimulation: crucial controls of immune tolerance and function. Immunol. Rev.229, 88–100 (2009). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ishida, Y., Agata, Y., Shibahara, K. & Honjo, T. Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J.11, 3887–3895 (1992). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keir, M. E., Butte, M. J., Freeman, G. J. & Sharpe, A. H. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol.26, 677–704 (2008). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang, X. et al. Tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 receptor is a tumor suppressor and mediates resistance to PD-1 blockade therapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA117, 6640–6650 (2020). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data