Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 22;23(1):374.
doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02460-3.

Evaluation of the Steno Type 1 Risk Engine in predicting cardiovascular events in an ethnic mixed population of type 1 diabetes mellitus and its association with chronic microangiopathy complications

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Steno Type 1 Risk Engine in predicting cardiovascular events in an ethnic mixed population of type 1 diabetes mellitus and its association with chronic microangiopathy complications

Isabella Cristina Paliares et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol. .

Abstract

Background: The Steno Type 1 Risk Engine (ST1RE) was developed to aid clinical decisions in primary prevention for individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D), as existing cardiovascular (CV) risk models for the general population and type 2 diabetes tend to underestimate CV risk in T1D. However, the applicability of ST1RE in different populations remains uncertain, as prediction models developed for one population may not accurately estimate risk in another. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the ST1RE in predicting CV events among ethnically mixed T1D individuals and its association with the progression of microangiopathy complications.

Methods: A retrospective survey of 435 adults with T1D who were free of CV events at baseline was assessed by ST1RE and chronic diabetes complications at 5 and 10 years of follow-up. The estimated CV risk rates were compared with the observed rates at 5 and 10 years using statistical analyses, including Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, Kaplan-Meier curves analysis and Cox-regression models.

Results: Among 435 patients (aged 25 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 21-32) with a median T1D duration of 13 years (IQR: 9-18), only 5% were categorized into the high ST1RE group. Within a median follow-up of 9.2 years (IQR 6.0-10.7), 5.5% of patients experienced a CV event (1.6%, 14.9%, and 50% from the low, moderate, and high-risk groups, respectively). The hazard ratios (HRs) for CV events were greater in the high-risk group (HR 52.02; 95% CI 18.60-145.51, p < 0.001) and in the moderate-risk group (HR 8.66; 95% CI 2.90-25.80, p < 0.001) compared to the low-risk group. The ST1RE estimated CV events were similar to the observed at 5 years (3.4% vs. 3.5%; χ2 = 10.12, p = 0.899) and 10 years (6.8% vs. 9.9%; χ2 = 14.80, p = 0.676) of follow-up. The progression of microangiopathies was greater in the high vs. low for retinopathy (p = 0.008), diabetic kidney disease (p < 0.001), peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.021), and autonomic neuropathy (p = 0.008).

Conclusions: ST1RE performed well in predicting CV events at 5 and 10 years of follow-up. Moreover, higher ST1RE scores were associated with the progression of microangiopathy complications in this genetically heterogeneous T1D population.

Keywords: Cardiovascular risk; Chronic diabetes complications; Macrovascular disease; Microangiopathy; Steno Type 1 Risk Engine; Type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan-Meier curve analysis of cardiovascular event-free survival according to Steno Type 1 Risk Engine (ST1RE) categories.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are presented as the area under the curve (AUC), also called the C-statistic, at 5 years (A) and 10 years (B) of follow-up according to the Steno Type 1 Risk Engine (ST1RE).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percentage of patients in each ST1RE group who experienced progression of retinopathy, diabetic kidney disease, peripheral neuropathy, or autonomic neuropathy during the follow-up period. * low versus high-risk group (p = 0.008); † low versus high-risk (p < 0.001), low-risk versus moderate-risk (p = 0.019), and moderate-risk versus high-risk group (p = 0.001); ‖ low versus high-risk (p = 0.021); ‡ low versus moderate- and high-risk groups (p = 0.008).

References

    1. Livingstone R, Boyle JG, Petrie JR. How tightly controlled do fluctuations in blood glucose levels need to be to reduce the risk of developing complications in people with type 1 diabetes? Diabet Med. 2019;37:513–21. - PubMed
    1. Soedamah-Muthu SS, Fuller JH, Mulnier HE, Raleigh VS, Lawrenson RA, Colhoun HM. High risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes in the U.K. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:798–804. - PubMed
    1. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, Eliasson B, Svensson A-M, Miftaraj M, McGuire DK, Sattar N, Rosengren A, Gudbjörnsdottir S. Range of risk factor levels: control, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2017;135:1522–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study Research Group. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular outcomes in type 1 diabetes: the DCCT/EDIC study 30-year follow-up. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:686–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller RG, Anderson SJ, Costacou T, Sekikawa A, Orchard TJ. Hemoglobin A1c level and cardiovascular disease incidence in persons with type 1 diabetes: an application of joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data in the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes complications Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187:1520–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources