Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2024 Oct 22;28(1):340.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05131-7.

An update on the mechanical versus manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients

Ayman El-Menyar  1   2 , Mashhood Naduvilekandy  3
Affiliations
Comment

An update on the mechanical versus manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients

Ayman El-Menyar et al. Crit Care. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Revised Forest plot of pooled odds ratio for ROSC of studies included in the Umbrella review after removing the duplicate and a study with a high variance
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Revised Forest plot of the pooled odds ratio of ROSC without data from abstracts or studies did not report ROSC as an outcome in their original research
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment on

References

    1. Zhao Y, Chen D, Wang Q. Comparison of mechanical versus manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in cardiac arrest. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):319. 10.1186/s13054-024-05088-7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. El-Menyar A, Naduvilekandy M, Rizoli S, Di Somma S, Cander B, Galwankar S, Lateef F, Abdul Rahman MA, Nanayakkara P, Al-Thani H. Mechanical versus manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): an umbrella review of contemporary systematic reviews and more. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):259. 10.1186/s13054-024-05037-4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheraton M, Columbus J, Surani S, Chopra R, Kashyap R. Effectiveness of mechanical chest compression devices over manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. West J Emerg Med. 2021;22(4):810–9. 10.5811/westjem.2021.3.50932. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hallstrom A, Rea TD, Sayre MR, Christenson J, Anton AR, Mosesso VN Jr, Van Ottingham L, Olsufka M, Pennington S, White LJ, Yahn S, Husar J, Morris MF, Cobb LA. Manual chest compression vs use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;295(22):2620–8. 10.1001/jama.295.22.2620. - PubMed
    1. Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA, Navarese EP, Verhaert DV, Verheugt FW, Smeets JL, de Boer MJ. Manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus cpr including a mechanical chest compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a comprehensive meta-analysis from randomized and observational studies. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;67(3):349-360.e3. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.09.023. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources