Comparing Cesarean Scar Defect Incidence After Locked and Unlocked Repair Methods Among Primiparous Patients: A Randomized Double-Blinded Trial
- PMID: 39439735
- PMCID: PMC11491697
- DOI: 10.18502/jfrh.v18i3.16655
Comparing Cesarean Scar Defect Incidence After Locked and Unlocked Repair Methods Among Primiparous Patients: A Randomized Double-Blinded Trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and cesarean scar defect (CSD) development after cesarean section using double-layer locked and unlocked closure techniques.
Materials and methods: We conducted a randomized double-blinded trial comparing double-layer locked and unlocked uterine closure techniques following cesarean section in primiparous women. The locked technique involved continuous suturing of the full myometrial thickness in the first layer, followed by back-and-forth needle maneuvering on both sides of the incision for the second layer. The unlocked method included running suturing of two-thirds of the myometrial thickness in the first layer, followed by suturing the upper half of the myometrial thickness in the second layer. Transvaginal ultrasonography was performed one year post-cesarean section, with RMT as the primary outcome and scar depth and width as secondary outcomes. Independent t-test and Chi-square test were utilized for statistical analysis.
Results: All 30 patients from the locked and 26 from the unlocked group in the follow-up were diagnosed with CSD (scar depth>2mm). The mean RMT for the unlocked and locked groups were 4.44±1.07mm and 4.12±0.48mm, respectively, showing no significant difference (p =0.14). There was also no significant difference in mean scar width between the locked and unlocked groups (3.68±1.44mm vs. 3.95±1.00mm, p =0.42). However, the mean scar depth was higher in the unlocked group (3.77±1.11 mm vs. 3.16±1.1mm, p =0.04).
Conclusion: We have found no significant differences in the RMT and CSD prevalence between two-layered locked and unlocked uterine closure techniques, while the scar depth was greater in the unlocked group. Nonetheless, future randomized trials implementing larger sample sizes are required to precisely compare the outcomes of the double-layer locked and unlocked uterine suturing techniques.
Keywords: Cesarean Section; Myometrium; Scar; Ultrasonography.
Copyright © 2024 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interests Authors declare no conflict of interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):507.e1-507.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916. Epub 2015 Nov 11. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26522861 Clinical Trial.
-
Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after elective second cesarean section.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Mar;34(6):943-947. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1622676. Epub 2019 May 30. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021. PMID: 31146610 Clinical Trial.
-
A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single vs. Double Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: The Effect on Uterine Scar Thickness.Ultraschall Med. 2018 Jun;39(3):343-351. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-112223. Epub 2016 Sep 14. Ultraschall Med. 2018. PMID: 27626240 Clinical Trial. English.
-
Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1097-1108. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15048. Epub 2018 Jan 30. BJOG. 2018. PMID: 29215795
-
Etiology of Cesarean Uterine Scar Defect (Niche): Detailed Critical Analysis of Hypotheses and Prevention Strategies and Peritoneal Closure Debate.J Clin Med Res. 2018 Mar;10(3):166-173. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3271w. Epub 2018 Jan 26. J Clin Med Res. 2018. PMID: 29416572 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Souza JP, Gülmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004–2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010;8:71. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Astrid MO, Henrik LJ, Tine DC, Krebs L. Maternal short-term complications after planned cesarean delivery without medical indication: A registry-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(7):905–12. - PubMed
-
- Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349–57. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources