Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Feb 1;31(2):190-200.
doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000480. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

The learning curve for robotic living donor right hepatectomy: Analysis of outcomes in 2 specialized centers

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The learning curve for robotic living donor right hepatectomy: Analysis of outcomes in 2 specialized centers

Yee L Cheah et al. Liver Transpl. .

Abstract

Robotic surgery is an emerging minimally invasive option for living donor hepatectomy. Currently, there are no studies on the learning curve of robotic donor hepatectomy. Thus, we evaluated the learning curve for robotic donor right hepatectomy. We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from consecutive living donors who underwent robotic hepatectomy at 2 specialized centers between 2016 and 2022. We estimated the number of cases required to achieve stable operating times for robotic donor right hepatectomy using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. The complication rates were similar between the 2 centers (22.8% vs. 26.7%; p = 0.74). Most complications were graded as minor (70.4%). Analysis of the total operative time demonstrated that the learning curves reached a peak at the 17th case in center 1 and the 9th case in center 2. The average operation times for cases 1-17 versus 18-99 in center 1 were 603 versus 438 minutes ( p < 0.001), and cases 1-9 versus 10-15 in center 2 were 532 versus 418 minutes ( p = 0.002). Complication rates were lower after the learning curves were achieved, although this did not reach statistical significance. A comparison of outcomes between centers suggests that a standardized approach to this complex operation can be successfully transferred.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R. Mark Ghobrial consults for TransMedics. The remaining authors have no conflicts to report.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Total operative time (minutes) for robotic right donor hepatectomy from centers 1 and 2.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Results of cumulative sum analysis of robotic living donor right hepatectomy. (A) Total operative time, (B) console time, (C) hilar dissection time.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Results of cumulative sum analysis of robotic living donor right hepatectomy. (A) Mobilization time, (B) parenchymal transection time.

References

    1. Cherqui D, Ciria R, Kwon CHD, Kim KH, Broering D, Wakabayashi G, et al. . Expert consensus guidelines on minimally invasive donor hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation from innovation to implementation: A joint initiative from the International Laparoscopic Liver Society (ILLS) and the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (A-PHPBA). Ann Surg. 2021;273:96–108. - PubMed
    1. Rho SY, Lee JG, Joo DJ, Kim MS, Kim SI, Han DH, et al. . Outcomes of robotic living donor right hepatectomy from 52 consecutive cases: Comparison with open and laparoscopy-assisted donor hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2022;275:e433–e442. - PubMed
    1. Broering DC, Elsheikh Y, Alnemary Y, Zidan A, Elsarawy A, Saleh Y, et al. . Robotic versus open right lobe donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation: A propensity score-matched analysis. Liver Transpl. 2020;26:1455–1464. - PubMed
    1. Chen PD, Wu CY, Hu RH, Ho CM, Lee PH, Lai HS, et al. . Robotic liver donor right hepatectomy: A pure, minimally invasive approach. Liver Transpl. 2016;22:1509–1518. - PubMed
    1. Ciria R, Berardi G, Alconchel F, Briceño J, Choi GH, Wu YM, et al. . The impact of robotics in liver surgery: A worldwide systematic review and short-term outcomes meta-analysis on 2,728 cases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022;29:181–197. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms