Alteration of Cecal Microbiota by Antimicrobial Peptides Enhances the Rational and Efficient Utilization of Nutrients in Holstein Bulls
- PMID: 39441337
- DOI: 10.1007/s12602-024-10379-0
Alteration of Cecal Microbiota by Antimicrobial Peptides Enhances the Rational and Efficient Utilization of Nutrients in Holstein Bulls
Abstract
We previously observed that supplementation with antimicrobial peptides facilitated the average daily weight gain, net meat, and carcass weights of Holstein bulls. To expand our knowledge of the possible impact of antimicrobial peptides on cecum microbiota, further investigations were conducted. In this study, 18 castrated Holstein bulls with insignificant weight differences and 10 months of age were split randomly into two groups. The control group (CK) was fed a basic diet, whereas the antimicrobial peptide group (AP) was supplemented with 8 g of antimicrobial peptides for 270 days. After slaughter, metagenomic and metabolomic sequencing analyses were performed on the cecum contents. The results showed significantly higher levels of amylase, cellulase, protease, and lipase in the CK than in the AP group (P ≤ 0.05). The levels of β-glucosidase and xylanase (P ≤ 0.05), and acetic and propionic acids (P ≤ 0.01), were considerably elevated in the AP than in the CK group. The metagenome showed variations between the two groups only at the bacterial level, and 3258 bacteria with differences were annotated. A total of 138 differential abundant genes (P < 0.05) were identified in the CAZyme map, with 65 genes more abundant in the cecum of the AP group and 48 genes more abundant in the cecum of the CK group. Metabolomic analysis identified 68 differentially expressed metabolites. Conjoint analysis of microorganisms and metabolites revealed that Lactobacillus had the greatest impact on metabolites in the AP group and Brumimicrobium in the CK group. The advantageous strains of the AP group Firmicutes bacterium CAG:110 exhibited a strong symbiotic relationship with urodeoxycholic acid and hyodeoxycholic acid. This study identified the classification characteristics, functions, metabolites, and interactions of cecal microbiota with metabolites that contribute to host growth performance. Antimicrobial peptides affect the cecal microorganisms, making the use of nutrients more efficient. The utilization of hemicellulose in the cecum of ruminants may contribute more than cellulose to their production performance.
Keywords: Antimicrobial peptides; Cecum; Holstein bull; Metabolite; Microorganism; Production performance.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Antimicrobial peptides act on the rumen microbiome and metabolome affecting the performance of castrated bulls.J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2023 Mar 9;14(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40104-023-00832-5. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 36890581 Free PMC article.
-
Castration alters the cecal microbiota and inhibits growth in Holstein cattle.J Anim Sci. 2022 Dec 1;100(12):skac367. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac367. J Anim Sci. 2022. PMID: 36326798 Free PMC article.
-
Castration alters the ileum microbiota of Holstein bulls and promotes beef flavor compounds.BMC Genomics. 2024 Apr 29;25(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10272-8. BMC Genomics. 2024. PMID: 38684965 Free PMC article.
-
Supplementation of dietary areca nut extract modulates the growth performance, cecal microbiota composition, and immune function in Wenchang chickens.Front Vet Sci. 2023 Dec 12;10:1278312. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1278312. eCollection 2023. Front Vet Sci. 2023. PMID: 38192720 Free PMC article.
-
Alterations of intestinal mucosal barrier, cecal microbiota diversity, composition, and metabolites of yellow-feathered broilers under chronic corticosterone-induced stress: a possible mechanism underlying the anti-growth performance and glycolipid metabolism disorder.Microbiol Spectr. 2024 May 2;12(5):e0347323. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03473-23. Epub 2024 Mar 18. Microbiol Spectr. 2024. PMID: 38497712 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Isshiki Y, Yokota HO, Nakahiro Y, Tasaki I (1974) Digestion and absorption in the of chickens. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho 45(9):488–493. https://doi.org/10.2508/chikusan.45.9_488 - DOI
-
- Yoshihara I, Kandatsu M (1960) Studies on cecum digestion part IV. On the movement of cecal contents in the rabbit (1). Agric Biol Chem. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb1924.24.543 - DOI
-
- Cheeke PR, Dierenfeld ES (2010) Comparative animal nutrition and metabolism. CAB International. 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936310.0000
-
- Allison MJ, Robinson IM, Bucklin JA, Booth GD (1979) Comparison of bacterial populations of the pig cecum and colon based upon enumeration with specific energy sources. Appl Environ Microbiol 37(6):1142–1151. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01332 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Xue MY, Sun HZ, Wu XH, Liu JX, Guan LL (2020) Multi-omics reveals that the rumen microbiome and its metabolome together with the host metabolome contribute to individualized dairy cow performance. Microbiome 8(1):64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00819-8 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials