Dissecting Secondary Immunodeficiency: Identification of Primary Immunodeficiency within B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders
- PMID: 39441407
- PMCID: PMC11499357
- DOI: 10.1007/s10875-024-01818-2
Dissecting Secondary Immunodeficiency: Identification of Primary Immunodeficiency within B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Dissecting Secondary Immunodeficiency: Identification of Primary Immunodeficiency within B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders.J Clin Immunol. 2025 Feb 7;45(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s10875-025-01865-3. J Clin Immunol. 2025. PMID: 39918595 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Distinguishing between primary (PID) and secondary (SID) immunodeficiencies, particularly in relation to hematological B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (B-CLPD), poses a major clinical challenge. We aimed to analyze and define the clinical and laboratory variables in SID patients associated with B-CLPD, identifying overlaps with late-onset PIDs, which could potentially improve diagnostic precision and prognostic assessment. We studied 37 clinical/laboratory variables in 151 SID patients with B-CLPD. Patients were classified as "Suspected PID Group" when having recurrent-severe infections prior to the B-CLPD and/or hypogammaglobulinemia according to key ESID criteria for PID. Bivariate association analyses showed significant statistical differences between "Suspected PID"- and "SID"-groups in 10 out of 37 variables analyzed, with "Suspected PID" showing higher frequencies of childhood recurrent-severe infections, family history of B-CLPD, significantly lower serum Free Light Chain (sFLC), immunoglobulin concentrations, lower total leukocyte, and switch-memory B-cell counts at baseline. Rpart machine learning algorithm was performed to potentially create a model to differentiate both groups. The model developed a decision tree with two major variables in order of relevance: sum κ + λ and history of severe-recurrent infections in childhood, with high sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 100%, and accuracy 91.8% for PID prediction. Identifying significant clinical and immunological variables can aid in the difficult task of recognizing late-onset PIDs among SID patients, emphasizing the value of a comprehensive immunological evaluation. The differences between "Suspected PID" and SID groups, highlight the need of early, tailored diagnostic and treatment strategies for personalized patient management and follow up.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; B cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders, secondary immunodeficiency; Clinical diagnosis; Early detection; Primary immunodeficiencies.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
JMG-A is an employee of Health in Code S.L.. The rest of authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Otani IM, et al. Practical guidance for the diagnosis and management of secondary hypogammaglobulinemia: a Work Group Report of the AAAAI primary immunodeficiency and altered Immune Response committees. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;149:1525–60. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
