A UK survey of young people's views on condom removal during sex
- PMID: 39441767
- PMCID: PMC11498692
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298561
A UK survey of young people's views on condom removal during sex
Abstract
Introduction: Non-consensual condom removal (NCCR) refers to the act of removing a condom during sex without the other person's permission. It poses physical and psychological risks to women's health. Views and attitudes regarding this sexual practice are not well understood in the UK. This study aimed to explore young people's views on the morality and criminality of NCCR and how their views are affected by negative health outcomes, relationship status, and socio-demographic characteristics.
Methods: A quantitative online survey of people aged 18-25 living in the UK was conducted. The survey consisted of two NCCR scenarios, varied by health outcome and relationship status, followed by questions about the morality and criminality of NCCR and respondents' socio-demographic characteristics. Statistical analysis included Chi-square testing and logistic regression modelling.
Results: Most of the 1729 respondents considered NCCR to be a violation of consent to sex (97.4%-98.1%), to be wrong (99.3%-99.5%), and to be sexual assault (86.3%-89.2%). Respondents were more likely to support prison time for NCCR if the victim got pregnant (52.1%) (rather than depressed (41.6%)) or was part of a casual hook-up (53.9%) (as opposed to a long-term dating relationship (47.2%). Respondents who were female or non-heterosexual were more likely to view NCCR as sexual assault and support prison as a penalty for NCCR.
Conclusion: The majority of young UK adults in this survey considered condom removal during sex without the other person's permission to be a violation of consent, morally wrong, and a form of sexual assault. Support for prison as a penalty was lower. These findings can inform future campaigns on consent in sexual relationships and legislation to provide support for women affected by NCCR.
Copyright: © 2024 Ezzat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
"That's not what was originally agreed to": Perceptions, outcomes, and legal contextualization of non-consensual condom removal in a Canadian sample.PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0219297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219297. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31291320 Free PMC article.
-
A Scoping Review of Nonconsensual Condom Removal ("Stealthing") Research.Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Jan;25(1):215-230. doi: 10.1177/15248380221146802. Epub 2023 Feb 1. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024. PMID: 36722370 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and reliability in reporting sexual partners and condom use in a Swiss population survey.Eur J Epidemiol. 1998 Feb;14(2):139-46. doi: 10.1023/a:1007435824281. Eur J Epidemiol. 1998. PMID: 9556172
-
Young Women Subjected to Nonconsensual Condom Removal: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Sexual Self-Perceptions.Violence Against Women. 2021 Aug;27(10):1696-1715. doi: 10.1177/1077801220947165. Epub 2020 Aug 18. Violence Against Women. 2021. PMID: 32811338
-
Young adults, alcohol and condom use: what is the connection?J Adolesc Health. 1994 May;15(3):238-44. doi: 10.1016/1054-139x(94)90509-6. J Adolesc Health. 1994. PMID: 8075094 Review.
References
-
- Ebrahim S. I’m Not Sure This Is Rape, But: An Exposition of the Stealthing Trend. Sage Open. 2019;9(2). doi: 10.1177/2158244019842201 - DOI
-
- Brodsky A. “Rape-Adjacent”: Imagining Legal Responses to Nonconsensual Condom Removal. Colum. J. Gender & L. 2016;32:183.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources