Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 1;31(12):2940-2951.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae265.

Equitable community-based participatory research engagement with communities of color drives All of Us Wisconsin genomic research priorities

Affiliations

Equitable community-based participatory research engagement with communities of color drives All of Us Wisconsin genomic research priorities

Suma K Thareja et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: The NIH All of Us Research Program aims to advance personalized medicine by not only linking patient records, surveys, and genomic data but also engaging with participants, particularly from groups traditionally underrepresented in biomedical research (UBR). This study details how the dialogue between scientists and community members, including many from communities of color, shaped local research priorities.

Materials and methods: We recruited area quantitative, basic, and clinical scientists as well as community members from our Community and Participant Advisory Boards with a predetermined interest in All of Us research as members of a Special Interest Group (SIG). An expert community engagement scientist facilitated 6 SIG meetings over the year, explicitly fostering openness and flexibility during conversations. We qualitatively analyzed discussions using a social movement framework tailored for community-based participatory research (CBPR) mobilization.

Results: The SIG evolved through CBPR stages of emergence, coalescence, momentum, and maintenance/integration. Researchers prioritized community needs above personal academic interests while community members kept discussions focused on tangible return of value to communities. One key outcome includes SIG-driven shifts in programmatic and research priorities of the All of Us Research Program in Southeastern Wisconsin. One major challenge was building equitable conversations that balanced scientific rigor and community understanding.

Discussion: Our approach allowed for a rich dialogue to emerge. Points of connection and disconnection between community members and scientists offered important guidance for emerging areas of genomic inquiry.

Conclusion: Our study presents a robust foundation for future efforts to engage diverse communities in CBPR, particularly on healthcare concerns affecting UBR communities.

Keywords: NIH All of Us Research Program; community-based participatory research; ethnic and racial minorities; genomic research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Slides from SIG presentations demonstrating visual storytelling. Photo 1A courtesy of Ézé Amos.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
All of Us Research Program participant counts shown by 3-digit zip codes on a map of Wisconsin as of 9 November 2022.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
AI-generated artwork (MidJourney AI) chosen in collaboration with the community to visually represent key concepts raised during SIG discussions and published with meeting notes on Medium.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Returning value to communities from the All of Us Research Program through innovative approaches for data use, analysis, dissemination, and research capacity building.
    Bakken S, Sang E, de Brujin B. Bakken S, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Dec 1;31(12):2773-2780. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae276. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024. PMID: 39657747 No abstract available.
  • The Estonian Biobank's journey from biobanking to personalized medicine.
    Milani L, Alver M, Laur S, Reisberg S, Haller T, Aasmets O, Abner E, Alavere H, Allik A, Annilo T, Fischer K, Hofmeister R, Hudjashov G, Jõeloo M, Kals M, Karo-Astover L, Kasela S, Kolde A, Krebs K, Krigul KL, Kronberg J, Kruusmaa K, Kukuškina V, Kõiv K, Lehto K, Leitsalu L, Lind S, Luitva LB, Läll K, Lüll K, Metsalu K, Metspalu M, Mõttus R, Nelis M, Nikopensius T, Nurm M, Nõukas M, Oja M, Org E, Palover M, Palta P, Pankratov V, Pantiukh K, Pervjakova N, Pujol-Gualdo N, Reigo A, Reimann E, Smit S, Rogozina D, Särg D, Taba N, Talvik HA, Teder-Laving M, Tõnisson N, Vaht M, Vainik U, Võsa U, Yelmen B, Esko T, Kolde R, Mägi R, Vilo J, Laisk T, Metspalu A. Milani L, et al. Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 5;16(1):3270. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58465-3. Nat Commun. 2025. PMID: 40188112 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. National Institutes of Health. All of Us Research Program Overview. Accessed February 28, 2023. https://allofus.nih.gov/about/program-overview
    1. National Institutes of Health. Researcher Workbench. Accessed June 28, 2024. https://www.researchallofus.org/data-tools/workbench/
    1. Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin All of Us Research Program. Home Page. Accessed February 28, 2023. https://mcw.joinallofus.org/
    1. Levine MV. The State of Black Milwaukee in national perspective: racial inequality in the nation’s 50 largest metropolitan areas. In: 65 Charts and Tables. UWM Digital Commons. Center for Economic Development Publications; 2020:56.
    1. Leydesdorff L, Ward J. Science shops: a kaleidoscope of science-society collaborations in Europe. Public Understand Sci. 2005;14:353-372.

Publication types