Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Dec:99:111664.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111664. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

Efficacy and safety of neuraxial hydromorphone: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and safety of neuraxial hydromorphone: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Sina Grape et al. J Clin Anesth. 2024 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Study objective: Neuraxial hydromorphone provides postoperative pain relief. However, the magnitude of this effect and the optimal dose remain unknown. The objective of this study is to clarify these uncertainties.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Setting: Postoperative recovery area and ward, up to 24 h.

Patients: Any patient undergoing any type of surgery or being in labor.

Interventions: Neuraxial hydromorphone versus control.

Measurements: Our primary outcome was rest pain score (analogue scale, 0-10) at 24 h according to route of administration (epidural versus spinal) and type of surgery (orthopedic versus other). Secondary outcomes included rest pain score at 0-4 and 8-12 h; rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and pruritus at 24 h.

Main results: Six trials, including 436 patients, were identified. Rest pain score at 24 postoperative hours was significantly reduced in the hydromorphone group, with a mean difference (95 %CI) of -0.4 (-0.8 to -0.1), I2 = 74 %, p = 0.01. Neuraxial hydromorphone did not increase postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio [95 %CI]: 1.2 [0.8-1.8], I2 = 27 %, p = 0.47), but increases pruritus (risk ratio [95 %CI]: 3.1 [1.6-5.9], I2 = 0 %, p = 0.0005). The quality of evidence was very low for our primary and secondary outcomes. In conclusion, there is very low level of evidence that neuraxial hydromorphone provides effective analgesia after surgery or labor, at the expense of an increased rate of pruritus. The improvement in pain scores appears to be clinically insignificant. With only six trials published over a period of 30 years, we were unable to perform a meta-regression.

Conclusions: If neuraxial hydromorphone is to be used regularly, trials focusing on the optimal dose and side-effects should be performed before widely administering this medication into the neuraxial space. More trials focusing on the optimal dose and side-effects should be performed before widely administering this medication into the neuraxial space.

Keywords: Hydromorphone; Postoperative analgesia; Postoperative nausea and vomiting; Spinal anesthesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources