Meta-analysis and systematic review of factors predicting conversion to radical nephrectomy following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in renal cancer patients
- PMID: 39443332
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02147-7
Meta-analysis and systematic review of factors predicting conversion to radical nephrectomy following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in renal cancer patients
Abstract
Evaluating the risk factors for the conversion from robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) to radical nephrectomy (RN). Through a comprehensive database search encompassing PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, we identified pertinent English-language research published by June 2024. We utilized the NOS scale for quality assessment. The aggregate effect was quantified via the odds ratio (OR), alongside a 95% confidence interval (CI). Sensitivity analyses were conducted using both fixed-effects and random-effects models to evaluate reliability. The meta-analytical process was facilitated by the Stata 18 software suite. Our meta-analysis encompassed a total of 8 retrospective studies and 3 prospective studies, totaling 4056 patients. We found that increasing patient age (OR: 1.04; 95% CI 1.00-1.08; P = 0.005), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores (3 or above) (OR: 2.74; 95% CI 1.52-4.93; P = 0.001), elevated R.E.N.A.L. scores (7 or above) (OR: 2.49; 95% CI 1.57-3.95; P < 0.001), and the use of off-clamp RAPN (OR: 7.21; 95% CI 2.60-19.93; P < 0.001) significantly raised the odds of surgical conversion. On the other hand, male sex (OR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.67-1.62; P = 0.858), the side of the tumor (OR: 0.97; 95% CI 0.48-1.95; P = 0.936), tumor size (OR: 3.43; 95% CI 0.57-20.55; P = 0.177), body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.96-1.11; P = 0.426), clinical stage (OR: 3.78; 95% CI 0.46-30.70; P = 0.214), and the use of single-port RAPN (OR: 0.54; 95% CI 0.16-1.78; P = 0.31) did not show a statistically significant link to an increased conversion risk. This meta-analysis elucidates the critical risk factors for the conversion from robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy to radical nephrectomy, providing significant guidance for preoperative risk assessment and clinical decision-making. However, our findings necessitate validation through studies with larger sample sizes.
Keywords: Conversion; Meta-analysis; Radical nephrectomy (RN); Renal cancer; Risk factor; Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Robotic partial nephrectomy vs minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass: a propensity score-matched comparison from the ROSULA (Robotic Surgery for Large Renal Mass) Collaborative Group.BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):114-123. doi: 10.1111/bju.15064. Epub 2020 Jun 15. BJU Int. 2020. PMID: 32232920
-
Conversion of Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy to Radical Nephrectomy: A Prospective Multi-institutional Study.Urology. 2018 Mar;113:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.046. Epub 2017 Dec 25. Urology. 2018. PMID: 29284123
-
Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of single-port versus conventional robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes.J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):765-777. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01491-w. Epub 2022 Dec 5. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 36469187 Review.
-
Off-clamp Versus On-clamp Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity-matched Analysis.Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Oct;6(5):525-530. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.04.005. Epub 2023 May 14. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37193626
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparison of Outcomes of Robot-Assisted versus Open Partial Nephrectomy in Clinical T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients.Urol Int. 2022;106(8):757-767. doi: 10.1159/000521881. Epub 2022 Feb 22. Urol Int. 2022. PMID: 35193139 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kim DK, Kim LH, Raheem AA, Shin TY, Alabdulaali I, Yoon YE, Han WK, Rha KH (2016) Comparison of trifecta and pentafecta outcomes between T1a and T1b renal masses following Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) with minimum one year follow up: can RAPN for T1b renal masses be feasible? PLoS ONE 11:e0151738 - PubMed - PMC
-
- García Rojo E, Hevia Palacios V, Brime Menendez R, Feltes Ochoa JA, Justo Quintas J, Lista Mateos F, Touijer K, Romero Otero J (2024) Da Vinci and Hugo RAS Platforms for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a preliminary prospective comparative analysis of the outcomes. Minerva Urol Nephrol 76:303–311 - PubMed
-
- Katzendorn O, Harke NN, Schiefelbein F, Schoen G, Wiesinger C, Pfuner J, Ubrig B, Gloger S, Osmonov D, Eraky A, Wagner C, Ayanle A, Hadaschik BA, Kesch C, Kuczyk MA, Siemer S, Stöckle M, Zeuschner P (2023) PE065 - Why do surgeons need to change their intraoperative plan? A multicentric analysis of conversions in 2459 robot-assisted partial nephrectomies. Eur Urol Open Sci 55:S109
-
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71 - PubMed - PMC
-
- Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, and Tugwell P (2000) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical