Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;15(12):2475-2487.
doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01647-x. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

Unveiling the Spectrum of Glucose Variability: A Novel Perspective on FreeStyle Libre Monitoring Data

Affiliations

Unveiling the Spectrum of Glucose Variability: A Novel Perspective on FreeStyle Libre Monitoring Data

Adrian H Heald et al. Diabetes Ther. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Since the introduction of insulin therapy, it has become apparent that type 1 diabetes (T1D) is accompanied by long-term microvascular and macrovascular complications. In the context of the many benefits of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), there remain opportunities to study the large amount of data now available in order to maximise its potential in the endeavour to reduce the occurrence of diabetes tissue complications in the longer term.

Methods: Continuous glucose monitoring values were downloaded for 89 type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) individuals for up to 18 months from 2021 to 2023. Data for patient demographics was also taken from the patient record which included Sex, Date of Birth, and Date of Diagnosis. The recorded laboratory glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) test results were also recorded. The glucose management index (GMI) was calculated from average glucose readings for 18 months using the formula GMI (%) = (0.82 - (Average glucose/100)). This was then adjusted to give GMI (mmol/mol) = 10.929 * (GMI (%) - 2.15). Average Glucose Fluctuation (AGF) was calculated by adding up the total absolute change value between all recorded results over 18 months and dividing by the number of results minus one. The % Above Critical Threshold (ACT) was calculated by summing the total number of occurrences for each result value. A cumulative 95% limit was then applied to identify the glucose value that only 5% of results exceeded in the overall population. Using this value, we estimated the percentage of total tests that were above the Critical Threshold (ACT).

Results: The mean age of the participants was 42.6 years, and the mean duration of T1D was 18.4 years. A total of 3.22 million readings were analysed, yielding an average blood glucose level of 10.3 mmol/l and a GMI of 57.2 mmol/mol. There was a strong correlation between GMI and measured HbA1c (r2 = 0.82). However, there were patients who had an above-critical threshold (ACT) of 4-10% at a GMI of 60 mmol/mol or less. The percentage average value at the time of day (%AVTD) was applied to all blood glucose readings at each 15-min interval throughout the day, averaged over 18 months. The %AVTD of GMI (overall average 57.2 mmol/mol) increased after midday, dipped at 18:00, and peaked at 22:00. The %AVTD of AGF (overall average 0.60 mmol/l) showed higher change rates after 09:00 declining at the end of the day. The %AVTD of ACT peaked at 22:00, with those having the highest %ACT showing an additional peak at 15:00.

Conclusions: We have shown here that the percentage glucose results above 18 mmol/l (top 5% of distribution) increased exponentially above 54 mmol/mol HbA1c. The %AVTD is introduced as a useful measure. Our data indicate that over the 24-h period, improvement in metabolic control could be focussed on the afternoon and evening, when there are higher-than-average levels of GMI, a higher-than-average degree of glucose change, and higher-than-average risks of being above the critical threshold. In conclusion, a measure of glycaemic variation based on the amplitude of glucose change to a population mean could be used to provide valuable clinical insights into glucose change over a 24-h period.

Keywords: Continuous glucose monitoring; Glucose variability; Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c); Type 1 diabetes (T1D).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations Conflict of Interest Adrian H Heald, Mike Stedman, John Warner-Levy, Lleyton Belston, Angela Paisley, Aleksandra Jotic, Nebojsa Lalic, Martin Gibson, Hellena H Habte-Asres, Martin Whyte, and Angus Forbes have nothing to disclose. Ethical Approval All participants were attending the clinic of one of the authors AHH. The FreeStyle Libre data are available in its entirety as part of their usual care for analysis by the clinical team. All patients were given the option to opt out of their data being analysed. Such data analysis in relation to clinical care is acceptable under UK research ethics guidance. We kept the patients whose data were fully analyzed informed in accordance with UK guidelines at https://digital.nhs.uk/services/national-data-opt-out/understanding-the-national-data-opt-out/protecting-patient-data. All data were full anonymised prior to analysis.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Glucose management indicator (GMI) calculated from 100 days of data, taken before a laboratory measured HbA1c. Each dot refers to a patient’s HbA1c result
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A Distribution of glucose values for all patients summated over 18 months. B The 18-month period for each patient was divided into 100-day slices and the % above critical threshold (ACT) and glucose management indicator (GMI) were calculated for each of these slices. Each dot refers to 90 days of glucose monitoring data for a given patient. BG blood glucose
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A Overall relation between percentage difference from the mean AGF and percentage difference from mean glucose management indicator (GMI). A circle denotes 50% of the population centred on the median value. Data are A overall, B split by sex, C split by age, and D split by duration of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Blue lines represent terciles. The larger points reflect the median values for both classes. Overlaid numbers represent the number of patients per nine quantiles and the change associated with the class shown. AGF average glucose fluctuation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A–C Variation across 24 h of the average result from all 15-min samples over total time as a percentage of the difference to the overall mean for that category. A Glucose management indicator (GMI) (mmol/mol) readings. B Average daily glucose fluctuation, AGF (mmol/l/day). C Percentage above critical threshold (ACT%)

References

    1. Deckert T, Poulsen JE, Larsen M. Prognosis of diabetics with diabetes onset before the age of thirty-one. survival, causes of death, and complications. Diabetologia. 1978;14(6):363–70. - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, Nathan DM. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977–86. - PubMed
    1. Beck RW, Connor CG, Mullen DM, Wesley DM, Bergenstal RM. The fallacy of average: how using HbA1c alone to assess glycemic control can be misleading. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:994–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heinemann L, Freckmann G, Müller-Wieland D, Kellerer M. Critical reappraisal of the time-in-range: alternative or useful addition to glycated hemoglobin? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020;14(5):922–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(25):2643–53. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources