The effect of sequential embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 39443375
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07764-z
The effect of sequential embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the impact of sequential embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes among patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF).
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search across various databases for eligible clinical trials from inception to January 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they compared sequential embryo transfer, comprising both cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos, with other transfer protocols in infertile women with repeated implantation failure. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman software. Our primary focus was on the ongoing pregnancy rate. Our secondary measures included rates of chemical pregnancies, clinical pregnancies, miscarriages, and multiple pregnancies.
Results: Seven RCTs, encompassing 909 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Sequential embryo transfer demonstrated a significant increase in the ongoing pregnancy rate compared to the control group (OR = 2.28, 95% CI [1.46, 3.56], p = 0.003). Moreover, the sequential embryo transfer group exhibited notable improvements in chemical and clinical pregnancy rates. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding multiple pregnancy and miscarriage rates (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: Sequential embryo transfer shows promise in enhancing pregnancy outcomes among RIF patients. However, additional trials are warranted to validate our findings.
Keywords: Pregnancy outcome; RIF; Recurrent implantation failure; Sequential embryo transfer.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Bar G, Harlev A, Alfayumi-Zeadna S et al (2020) Recurrent implantation failure: which patients benefit from endometrial scratching prior to IVF? Arch Gynecol Obstet 301:817–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05424-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Simon A, Laufer N (2012) Repeated implantation failure: clinical approach. Fertil Steril 97:1039–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Busnelli A, Reschini M, Cardellicchio L et al (2020) How common is real repeated implantation failure? An indirect estimate of the prevalence. Reprod Biomed Online 40:91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.10.014 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cakiroglu Y, Tiras B (2020) Determining diagnostic criteria and cause of recurrent implantation failure. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 32:198–204. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000620 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wu Y, Li L, Liu L et al (2019) Autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells intrauterine instillation to improve pregnancy outcomes after recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 300:1445–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05275-w - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
