Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 23;14(1):25087.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76267-3.

Application of quality indicators and critical lessons learned assessment as a research approach for the evaluation of rescue missions during terrorist attacks

Affiliations

Application of quality indicators and critical lessons learned assessment as a research approach for the evaluation of rescue missions during terrorist attacks

Thomas Wurmb et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In Wuerzburg, Germany, a terrorist attack and a killing rampage occurred five years apart (2016 and 2021). Following a structured evaluation of the rescue mission in 2016, a bundle of quality indicators and ten "lessons learned" were defined. Aim of the presented study was to compare the two rescue missions and to critically review the lessons learned from 2016 for their implementation and feasibility. An interdisciplinary and inter-professional group of experts analyzed the data using predefined quality indicators. All lessons defined in 2016 were critically reviewed and qualified as either lessons learned or lessons identified. While seven out of ten lessons were successfully implemented after 2016 (lessons learned), three lessons didn´t work and were recategorized as lessons identified (communication, zoning and the mutual exchange of different tactical approaches). Our results demonstrate that the conclusions drawn in 2016 have helped to improve the performance of the rescue forces in 2021. In addition, the identified lessons are now the basis for further improving emergency and disaster preparedness. It is important to understand, that the process of preparedness improvement is not completed with the definition of lessons identified. These must first be integrated into response plans and then trained intensively. A lesson identified only becomes a lesson learned once it has been successfully applied.

Keywords: Disaster response; Emergency planning; Lessons learned; Terrorism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Incident site 2016.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Incindent site 2021.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flowchart of the comparison of lessons learned.

Similar articles

References

    1. Autrey, A. W. et al. 3 Echo: concept of operations for early care and evacuation of victims of mass violence. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 29(4), 421–428 (2014). - PubMed
    1. Hirsch, M. et al. The medical response to multisite terrorist attacks in Paris. Lancet 386(10012), 2535–2538 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Ghanchi, A. Insights into French emergency planning, response, and resilience procedures from a hospital managerial perspective following the Paris terrorist attacks of friday, november 13, 2015. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 10(5), 789–794 (2016). - PubMed
    1. Borel, M. et al. Organization in response to massive afflux of war victims in civilian practice—experimental feedback from the November 2015 Paris terrorist attacks. J. Visc. Surg. 154(Suppl 1), S3-s7 (2017). - PubMed
    1. Wurmb, T. et al. Structured analysis, evaluation and report of the emergency response to a terrorist attack in Wuerzburg, Germany using a new template of standardised quality indicators. Scand. J. Trauma, Resusc. Emerg. Med. 26(1), 87 (2018). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources