Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2024 Oct 9:5:1409352.
doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1409352. eCollection 2024.

Case Report: Reduction in post-amputation phantom limb pain intensity accompanying the onset of phantom limb telescoping

Affiliations
Case Reports

Case Report: Reduction in post-amputation phantom limb pain intensity accompanying the onset of phantom limb telescoping

Andrea Aternali et al. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with limb loss frequently report post-amputation phenomena, including nonpainful phantom sensations, phantom limb pain (PLP), and residual limb pain (RLP). Although post-amputation pain is common, not all patients benefit from widely accepted treatments. A greater understanding of phantom limb "telescoping", the experience of one's phantom hand or foot gradually approaching the residual limb, may assist in developing more effective interventions for reducing post-amputation pain. This case report explores the relationships between PLP, RLP, telescoping, and psychosocial experience in one person with a lower limb amputation. The aim of this case is to illustrate one possible relationship between telescoping and PLP as the mechanisms linking the two remain equivocal.

Methods: The participant is a 35-year-old male who underwent a transfemoral amputation due to a traumatic injury to his right leg approximately 4 years prior. He responded to questionnaires evaluating demographic and health-related information (e.g., age, sex, marital status, reason for amputation), pain and psychological variables via the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-SF), ID Pain Questionnaire (IDPQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PSC-4), Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC2), and Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8) and telescoping, measured by a newly developed app. The participant completed a semi-structured interview that was designed to ascertain patterns in the overlapping experience of phantom limb telescoping and post-amputation pain.

Results: The participant rated his average PLP as 10 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst pain imaginable") shortly after amputation. Approximately 12 months later, the participant noticed a shortening of his phantom limb, with a concurrent decrease in PLP. At present, his average NRS pain intensity is a 5/10. The participant described how the daily, debilitating PLP intensity diminished to weekly, manageable pain over time. Most notably, his responses on questionnaires were consistent with neuropathic PLP, mild to moderate levels of pain interference, a high level of catastrophic thinking about pain, low optimism, and mild symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Discussion: In this report, telescoping appeared to be preceded by an initial reduction in PLP intensity but these findings are based on a single case report and must be replicated with a large sample size before we have a clearer idea of the relationship between telescoping and PLP. This study provides insight into factors that may maintain PLP, generating targets for further investigation.

Keywords: case report; phantom limb pain; phantom sensations; post-amputation pain; residual limb pain; telescoping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An illustration of the participant's selected level of amputation and the associated visual representation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A visual representation of the participant's selected level of amputation (above knee), phantom limb (foot and ankle), and degree of telescoping (76%).

Similar articles

References

    1. Diers M, Krumm B, Fuchs X, Bekrater-Bodmann R, Milde C, Trojan J, et al. The prevalence and characteristics of phantom limb pain and non-painful phantom phenomena in a nationwide survey of 3,374 unilateral limb amputees. J Pain. (2022) 23(3):411–23. 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.09.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richardson C, Glenn S, Nurmikko T, Horgan M. Incidence of phantom phenomena including phantom limb pain 6 months after major lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Clin J Pain. (2006) 22(4):353–8. 10.1097/01.ajp.0000177793.01415.bd - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schone HR, Baker CI, Katz J, Nikolajsen L, Limakatso K, Flor H, et al. Making sense of phantom limb pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2022) 93(8):833–43. 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328428 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richardson C, Kulkarni J. A review of the management of phantom limb pain: challenges and solutions. J Pain Res. (2017) 10:1861–70. 10.2147/JPR.S124664 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stankevicius A, Wallwork SB, Summers SJ, Hordacre B, Stanton TR. Prevalence and incidence of phantom limb pain, phantom limb sensations and telescoping in amputees: a systematic rapid review. Eur J Pain. (2021) 25(1):23–38. 10.1002/ejp.1657 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources