Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 23;7(10):e70153.
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70153. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging: Assessment of perfusion at pancreatic resection margin during pancreatoduodenectomy: A cross sectional study

Affiliations

Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging: Assessment of perfusion at pancreatic resection margin during pancreatoduodenectomy: A cross sectional study

Roshan Ghimire et al. Health Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Background: Clinically relevant-postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is one of the dreaded complications of pancreatoduodenectomy. Vascularity of the stump of the pancreas during pancreatico-enteric anastomosis is considered one of the major determinants of POPF. Indocyanine green (ICG) is one of the modality for vascular assessment; hence, we aimed to evaluate the role of ICG fluorescence imaging to assess the vascularity of the pancreatic stump during pancreatoduodenectomy.

Methodology: The study was conducted at Kathmandu Medical College, Kathmandu, Nepal, during the period of 1 year (June 01, 2022-July 31, 2023). All of the patients who were undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were included in the study. In all cases, intraoperatively, ICG fluorescence detection at the pancreatic stump margin was evaluated using near-infrared light.

Results: A total of 28 patients underwent PD during this period. The ICG fluorescence imaging was positive at the pancreatic stump margin in 25 out of the 28 patients (89%), and in three cases, the florescence was negative. In patients who had negative fluorescence, revision of the stump margin was performed. Clinically relevant POPF was noted in 2 out of 28 cases, which had a soft pancreas with a small duct, although the pancreatic stump margin had good ICG florescence per-operatively.

Conclusion: ICG is inexpensive and a safe dye to use in clinical practice. We can objectively assess the pancreatic stump vascularity using intraoperative ICG fluorescence imaging, thereby potentially decreasing postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Keywords: fluorescence; indocyanine green; pancreatic stump; pancreatoduodenectomy; perfusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose. This study was presented at the 34th World Congress of the International Association of Surgeons, Gastroenterologists, and Oncologists (IASGO) in Verona, Italy, in September 2023.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pancreatic stump margin showing inadequate perfusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pancreatic stump margin showing adequate perfusion.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pancreatic viable stump after pancreaticogastrostomy.

References

    1. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single‐institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(9):1199‐1211. 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.08.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mathur A, Pitt HA, Marine M, et al. Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):1058‐1064. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31814a6906 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006;244(1):10‐15. 10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lai ECH. Measures to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a comprehensive review. AArch Surg. 2009;144(11):1074. 10.1001/archsurg.2009.193 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oneil Machado N. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: definitions, risk factors, preventive measures, and management—review. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:1‐10. 10.1155/2012/602478 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources