Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 22;85(Suppl 2):e131-e144.
doi: 10.1055/a-2222-0016. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Skull Base Repair following Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review (Part 2: The Translabyrinthine Approach)

Affiliations

Skull Base Repair following Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review (Part 2: The Translabyrinthine Approach)

Joachim Starup-Hansen et al. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. .

Abstract

Objectives Despite advances in skull base reconstruction techniques, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks remain a relatively common complication after translabyrinthine (TL) vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize the repair techniques and materials used in TL VS surgery to prevent CSF leaks. Design A systematic review of studies published since 2000 reporting techniques to prevent CSF leaks during adult TL VS surgery was conducted. A narrative synthesis of primary repair protocols was produced, and a taxonomy was established. Additionally, the advantages, disadvantages, and associated CSF leak rates of different repair protocols were extracted. Results All 43 studies were case series, and 39 were retrospective. Repair strategies included heterogeneous combinations of autografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials. A taxonomy was produced, classifying repairs into seven distinct stages, including approaches to the dura, middle ear cleft, air cells, TL bony defect, extra-cranial soft tissue, postoperative dressings, and CSF diversion. The median postoperative incidence of CSF leaks was 6% (interquartile range: 0-10%). Conclusions This systematic review reveals substantial inter-institutional heterogeneity in intraoperative strategies to prevent CSF leaks following TL VS surgery. However, comparing these techniques is challenging due to the multiple predictive factors for CSF leaks and their inconsistent reporting. We propose a taxonomy of seven stages to classify operative techniques and materials aimed at preventing CSF leaks. We recommend that future evaluations should adopt a prospective approach encompassing data collection strategies that considers all operative stages described by our taxonomy.

Keywords: CSF leak; ear nose and throat; neurosurgery; skull base repair; translabyrinthine approach; vestibular schwannoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart describing how articles were selected for inclusion in the final analysis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Taxonomy of translabyrinthine repair protocols. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; EVD, external ventricular drain; HAC, hydroxyapatite cement; N/A, not applicable; TL, translabyrinthine.

Similar articles

References

    1. Roberti F, Wind J J, Perez R, Caputy A J. The translabyrinthine approach in residency training. “Step by step” surgical anatomy from the dissection laboratory to the operative room. J Otol. 2021;16(02):99–108. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sughrue M E, Yang I, Aranda D et al.Beyond audiofacial morbidity after vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(02):367–374. - PubMed
    1. McRackan T R, Brackmann D E. Historical perspective on evolution in management of lateral skull base tumors. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015;48(03):397–405. - PubMed
    1. Ansari S F, Terry C, Cohen-Gadol A A. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(03):E14. - PubMed
    1. Fang C, Zhu T, Zhang P, Xia L, Sun C. Risk factors of neurosurgical site infection after craniotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45(11):e123–e134. - PubMed