Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 16:2024:2145560.
doi: 10.1155/2024/2145560. eCollection 2024.

Clinical Analysis of 32 Cases of Subglottic Benign Airway Stenosis Treated With Montgomery T Silicone Stent

Affiliations

Clinical Analysis of 32 Cases of Subglottic Benign Airway Stenosis Treated With Montgomery T Silicone Stent

Zhenyu Yang et al. Can Respir J. .

Abstract

Objective: To explore the complications of long-term placement of Montgomery T silicone stent (T-tube) in the treatment of subglottic benign airway stenosis (SBAS) and the timing of successful T-tube removal. Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 32 patients with SBAS who underwent the treatment of T-tube and analyzed their placement and successful removal of the T-tube. Results: There were 22 males and 10 females, aged from 21 to 79 years (60.9 ± 13.7 years). The T-tubes were successfully placed in all 32 patients, and 6 patients (18.8%) with mild stenosis were placed by the intravenous conscious sedation. The longest follow-up period was 60.4 months, and 17 patients (53.1%) had the T-tubes for more than 12 months; 5 patients (15.6%) were changed to the tracheostomy cannula after unplanned removal of the T-tubes for various reasons; the T-tubes were successfully removed in 9 patients (28.1%), and the duration of T-tubes placement was 5.2-22.7 months (12.1 ± 6.3 months), among them anatomical stenosis in 9 patients (100%). Secretion retention was observed in 32 patients (100%), granulation tissue hyperplasia was observed in 9 patients (28.1%), and the normal ventilation was not affected in most patients by bronchoscopic treatment and follow-up; the T-tubes were removed in 3 patients due to severe complications. There was no significant difference in the incidences of secretion retention and granulation tissue hyperplasia between the time point at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months, p > 0.05. In patients with T-tube more than 12 months, the severity of secretion retention at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months was significantly different, p < 0.05, however, there was no significant difference in the severity of granulation tissue hyperplasia, p > 0.05. Conclusions: T-tube is safe and effective in the treatment of SBAS. The severity of secretion retention increased in patients with long-term placement of the T-tube. For patients with mild stenosis and anatomical stenosis, the T-tube removal can be attempted at about 1 year of follow-up.

Keywords: complication; long-term follow-up; montgomery T silicone stent; stent removal; subglottic benign airway stenosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Typical subglottic benign airway stenosis and T-tube placement. (a) Hypertrophic mucosa above the tracheotomy cannula, (b) proliferating granulation tissue above the tracheotomy cannula, and (c) successful placement of T-tube.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Typical manifestations of complications. (a) Phlegm scab in the middle of T-tube (severe complication) and (b) proliferating granulation tissue in the lower end of T-tube (mild complication).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Successful removal of T-tube. (a) Successful removal of T-tube and placement of metal tracheotomy cannula, (b) a little secretion in the above of tracheotomy cannula after successful removal of T-tube at 1 week, and (c) no obvious secretions and granulation tissue in the above of tracheotomy cannula after successful removal of T-tube at 1 week, and successful removal of metal tracheotomy cannula in this patient in the end.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carpenter D. J., Hamdi O. A., Finberg A. M., Daniero J. J. Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Mechanistic Review. Head and Neck . 2022;44(8):1948–1960. doi: 10.1002/hed.27079. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perryman M. C., Kraft S. M., Kavookjian H. L. Laryngotracheal Reconstruction for Subglottic and Tracheal Stenosis. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America . 2023;56(4):769–778. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2023.04.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maurizi G., Vanni C., Rendina E. A, et al. Surgery for Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Improved Results. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery . 2021;161(3):845–852. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.12.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jin B. B., Wang J., Wang Y. L, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Montgomery T-Tube Placement for Benign Complex Subglottic Tracheal Stenosis: A Retrospective Analysis of 29 Cases. Zhonghua Jiehe He Huxi Zazhi . 2021;44(12):1064–1070. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20210508-00312. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu F. J., Yao Y. W., Chen E. G, et al. Efficacy and Safety Profile of Montgomery T-Tube Implantation in Patients With Tracheal Stenosis. Canadian Respiratory Journal . 2020;2020:7. doi: 10.1155/2020/2379814.2379814 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources