Advancing patient-centered clinical decision support in today's health care ecosystem: key themes from the Clinical Decision Support Innovation Collaborative's 2023 Annual Meeting
- PMID: 39445034
- PMCID: PMC11498195
- DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae109
Advancing patient-centered clinical decision support in today's health care ecosystem: key themes from the Clinical Decision Support Innovation Collaborative's 2023 Annual Meeting
Abstract
Objective: This perspective summarizes key themes that arose from stakeholder discussions at the inaugural Clinical Decision Support Innovation Collaborative (CDSiC) 2023 Annual Meeting. The CDSiC is an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-funded innovation hub for patient-centered clinical decision support (PC CDS).
Materials and methods: The meeting took place on May 16-17, 2023, and engaged 73 participants that represented a range of stakeholder groups including researchers, informaticians, federal representatives, clinicians, patients, and electronic health record developers. Each meeting session was recorded and had 2 notetakers. CDSiC leadership analyzed the compiled meeting notes to synthesize key themes.
Results: Participants discussed 7 key opportunities to advance PC CDS: (1) establish feedback loops between patients and clinicians; (2) develop new workflows; (3) expand the evidence base; (4) adapt the CDS Five Rights for the patient perspective; (5) advance health equity; (6) explore perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence; and (7) encourage widespread use and scalability of PC CDS.
Discussion and conclusion: Innovative approaches are needed to ensure patients' and caregivers' voices are meaningfully included to advance PC CDS.
Keywords: clinical decision support systems; patient-centered care; value-based health care.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association.
Conflict of interest statement
No authors have any competing interests to declare aside from the stated affiliation of each author with his/her employer. The perspectives expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Similar articles
-
New Performance Measurement Framework for Realizing Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support: Qualitative Development Study.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e68674. doi: 10.2196/68674. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40306630 Free PMC article.
-
Proceedings of the 2017 Advancing the Science of Community Engaged Research (CEnR) Conference.BMC Proc. 2019 Apr 19;13(Suppl 3):3. doi: 10.1186/s12919-019-0164-y. eCollection 2019. BMC Proc. 2019. PMID: 31019549 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1233-1243. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac059. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35534996 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers, Facilitators, and Potential Solutions to Advancing Interoperable Clinical Decision Support: Multi-Stakeholder Consensus Recommendations for the Opioid Use Case.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:637-646. eCollection 2019. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020. PMID: 32308858 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support-Where Are We and Where to Next?Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25;310:444-448. doi: 10.3233/SHTI231004. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024. PMID: 38269842 Review.
References
-
- Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R, et al.Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:29-43. - PubMed
-
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press; 2001. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources