Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;114(2):276-284.
doi: 10.1111/ejh.14331. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

Distance to CAR-T Treatment Center Does Not Impede Delivery

Affiliations

Distance to CAR-T Treatment Center Does Not Impede Delivery

Xiu Xia Sherry Tan et al. Eur J Haematol. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma, but real-world evidence is needed to confirm safety and efficacy when facing the unique challenges of a wide geographical catchment area.

Methods: We reviewed patients treated with commercially available CAR-T at a medium-sized single center in Canada (The Ottawa Hospital) between December 2020 and July 2022 (Canadian implementation started in 2020).

Results: Fifty-one patients (59% male, median age 62) traveled a median distance of 655 km (range 3-3659) for treatment. Median time from apheresis to CAR-T infusion was 36 days (range 26-81). With a median follow-up of 383 days (95% CI: 333-480), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 257 days (95% CI: 92-NE) and 422 days (95% CI: 106-NE), respectively. The median PFS for out-of-province patients was 115 days (95% CI: 91-NE) versus 280 days for in-province patients (95% CI: 142-NE), p = 0.12. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that distance from treatment center (p = 0.05) and refractory disease status (p = 0.003) were independently associated with shorter PFS. The time from the last disease progression to CAR-T referral was longer for out-of-province patients, but there was no difference in the time of referral to CAR-T consult, apheresis, or CAR-T infusion between in-province and out-of-province patients.

Conclusion: Our results confirm that despite the complexity of CAR-T therapy administration, Ottawa can effectively provide commercial CAR-T therapy in a timely fashion for patients from across the country.

Keywords: cellular immunotherapy; chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell; lymphoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. S. J. Schuster, M. R. Bishop, C. S. Tam, et al., “Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma,” New England Journal of Medicine 380 (2019): 45–56, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804980.
    1. S. S. Neelapu, F. L. Locke, N. L. Bartlett, et al., “Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T‐Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B‐Cell Lymphoma,” New England Journal of Medicine 377 (2017): 2531–2544, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1707447.
    1. M. Crump, S. S. Neelapu, U. Farooq, et al., “Outcomes in Refractory Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma: Results From the International SCHOLAR‐1 Study,” Blood 130 (2017): 1800–1808, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood‐2017‐03‐769620.
    1. S. S. Neelapu, F. L. Locke, N. L. Bartlett, et al., “Comparison of 2‐Year Outcomes With CAR T Cells (ZUMA‐1) vs Salvage Chemotherapy in Refractory Large B‐Cell Lymphoma,” Blood Advances 5 (2021): 4149–4155, https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003848.
    1. L. J. Nastoupil, M. D. Jain, L. Feng, et al., “Standard‐Of‐Care Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B‐Cell Lymphoma: Results From the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 38 (2020): 3119–3128, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.02104.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources