Distance to CAR-T Treatment Center Does Not Impede Delivery
- PMID: 39445482
- DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14331
Distance to CAR-T Treatment Center Does Not Impede Delivery
Abstract
Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma, but real-world evidence is needed to confirm safety and efficacy when facing the unique challenges of a wide geographical catchment area.
Methods: We reviewed patients treated with commercially available CAR-T at a medium-sized single center in Canada (The Ottawa Hospital) between December 2020 and July 2022 (Canadian implementation started in 2020).
Results: Fifty-one patients (59% male, median age 62) traveled a median distance of 655 km (range 3-3659) for treatment. Median time from apheresis to CAR-T infusion was 36 days (range 26-81). With a median follow-up of 383 days (95% CI: 333-480), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 257 days (95% CI: 92-NE) and 422 days (95% CI: 106-NE), respectively. The median PFS for out-of-province patients was 115 days (95% CI: 91-NE) versus 280 days for in-province patients (95% CI: 142-NE), p = 0.12. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that distance from treatment center (p = 0.05) and refractory disease status (p = 0.003) were independently associated with shorter PFS. The time from the last disease progression to CAR-T referral was longer for out-of-province patients, but there was no difference in the time of referral to CAR-T consult, apheresis, or CAR-T infusion between in-province and out-of-province patients.
Conclusion: Our results confirm that despite the complexity of CAR-T therapy administration, Ottawa can effectively provide commercial CAR-T therapy in a timely fashion for patients from across the country.
Keywords: cellular immunotherapy; chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell; lymphoma.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- S. J. Schuster, M. R. Bishop, C. S. Tam, et al., “Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma,” New England Journal of Medicine 380 (2019): 45–56, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804980.
-
- S. S. Neelapu, F. L. Locke, N. L. Bartlett, et al., “Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T‐Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B‐Cell Lymphoma,” New England Journal of Medicine 377 (2017): 2531–2544, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1707447.
-
- M. Crump, S. S. Neelapu, U. Farooq, et al., “Outcomes in Refractory Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma: Results From the International SCHOLAR‐1 Study,” Blood 130 (2017): 1800–1808, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood‐2017‐03‐769620.
-
- S. S. Neelapu, F. L. Locke, N. L. Bartlett, et al., “Comparison of 2‐Year Outcomes With CAR T Cells (ZUMA‐1) vs Salvage Chemotherapy in Refractory Large B‐Cell Lymphoma,” Blood Advances 5 (2021): 4149–4155, https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003848.
-
- L. J. Nastoupil, M. D. Jain, L. Feng, et al., “Standard‐Of‐Care Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B‐Cell Lymphoma: Results From the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 38 (2020): 3119–3128, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.02104.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
