Effects of Different Stretching Modalities on the Antagonist and Agonist Muscles on Isokinetic Strength and Vertical Jump Performance in Young Men
- PMID: 39446677
- DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004937
Effects of Different Stretching Modalities on the Antagonist and Agonist Muscles on Isokinetic Strength and Vertical Jump Performance in Young Men
Abstract
Montalvo, S, Gonzalez, MP, Dietze-Hermosa, MS, Martinez, A, Rodriguez, S, Gomez, M, Ibarra-Mejia, G, Tan, E, and Dorgo, S. Effects of different stretching modalities on the antagonist and agonist muscles on isokinetic strength and vertical jump performance in young men. J Strength Cond Res 39(2): 173-183, 2025-Exercise warm-up may include static or dynamic stretching, impacting performance differently. This study investigated the effects of various stretching protocols on isokinetic strength, muscular activity, and vertical jump performance. Sixteen subjects, divided evenly between trained and untrained groups, underwent 8 distinct stretching conditions in random order. Outcomes measured included isokinetic knee extension and flexion torque and power, muscular activity (vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and biceps femoris), and jump performance (jump height and modified reactive strength index [RSImod]). Responses to the stretching conditions were analyzed using a mixed-methods approach. For isokinetic knee extension, dynamic stretching of both agonist and antagonist (DY-AG-ANT) and combined dynamic agonist with static antagonist stretching (DY-AG ST-ANT) produced significant improvements. Dynamic stretching of both agonist and antagonist increased peak torque by 12.72% and average torque by 30.80%, while DY-AG ST-ANT increased peak torque by 15.61% and average torque by 41.06%. Muscular activity also improved significantly; DY-AG ST-ANT increased EMG activity of the vastus lateralis by 29.43% and vastus medialis by 70.75%. Biceps femoris saw a 33.18% increase with DY-AG and a 22.15% increase with ST-AG. Countermovement jump height improved with DY-AG-ANT (12.6%) and static antagonist (ST-ANT) conditions (11.3%) ( p < 0.05). Dynamic stretching of both agonist and antagonist also enhanced average power knee extension by 32.41%, while ST-AG DY-ANT improved it by 31.09% ( p < 0.05). Dynamic stretching, especially when combined with static stretching, optimizes isokinetic strength, muscular activity, and jump height. Coaches should incorporate dynamic stretching, alone or with static antagonist stretching, to maximize performance.
Copyright © 2024 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Similar articles
-
Acute effects of antagonist stretching on jump height, torque, and electromyography of agonist musculature.J Strength Cond Res. 2012 May;26(5):1249-56. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824f2399. J Strength Cond Res. 2012. PMID: 22344065 Clinical Trial.
-
Combined Effects of Static and Dynamic Stretching on the Muscle-Tendon Unit Stiffness and Strength of the Hamstrings.J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Apr 1;38(4):681-686. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004676. J Strength Cond Res. 2024. PMID: 38513176
-
Exercise for haemophilia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 19;12(12):CD011180. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011180.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27992070 Free PMC article.
-
Responses to a combined dynamic stretching and antagonist static stretching warm-up protocol on isokinetic leg extension performance.Sports Biomech. 2024 Oct;23(10):1455-1470. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2021.1944290. Epub 2021 Jul 15. Sports Biomech. 2024. PMID: 34263693 Clinical Trial.
-
Electromyostimulation--a systematic review of the effects of different electromyostimulation methods on selected strength parameters in trained and elite athletes.J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Sep;26(9):2600-14. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823f2cd1. J Strength Cond Res. 2012. PMID: 22067247
Cited by
-
60-Second Static Stretching of Lower Limb Muscles Disrupts Muscular Performance and Control in Active Male Adults.J Sports Sci Med. 2025 Mar 1;24(1):195-204. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2025.195. eCollection 2025 Mar. J Sports Sci Med. 2025. PMID: 40046220 Free PMC article.
-
Time-dependent effects of acute stretching on power, balance, and flexibility in contemporary dancers: a randomized crossover trial.Sci Rep. 2025 May 3;15(1):15489. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00027-0. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40319037 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Abernethy P, Wilson G, Logan P. Strength and power assessment: Issues, controversies and challenges. Sports Med 19: 401–417, 1995.
-
- Behm DG, Chaouachi A. A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 111: 2633–2651, 2011.
-
- Bosco C, Luhtanen P, Komi PV. A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 50: 273–282, 1983.
-
- Chaabene H, Behm DG, Negra Y, Granacher U; NLM. Acute effects of static stretching on muscle strength and power: An attempt to clarify previous caveats. Front Physiol 10: 1468, 2019.
-
- Chiu LZ, Fry AC, Weiss LW, et al. Postactivation potentiation response in athletic and recreationally trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res 17: 671–677, 2003.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources