Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 May;34(5):1590-1599.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08514-0. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

ISSLS Prize in Clinical Science 2025: A randomized trial on three different minimally invasive decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Five years follow-up from the NORDSTEN-SST

Erland Hermansen  1   2 , Kari Indrekvam  3   4 , Eric Franssen  5 , Tor Åge Myklebust  6   7 , Ivar Magne Austevoll  3   4 , Christian Hellum  8 , Kjersti Storheim  8 , Ingrid Fjeldheim Bånerud  8 , Eira Kathleen Ebbs  8 , Jørn Aaen  6   9 , Hasan Banitalebi  10   11 , Jens Ivar Brox  8 , Clemens Weber  5   12 , Tore Solberg  13   14 , Arild Hjulstad  15 , Helena Brisby  16   17
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

ISSLS Prize in Clinical Science 2025: A randomized trial on three different minimally invasive decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Five years follow-up from the NORDSTEN-SST

Erland Hermansen et al. Eur Spine J. 2025 May.

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: The short-term clinical outcome for midline-preserving posterior decompression techniques was comparable. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical results after three different midline-preserving posterior decompression techniques.

Material: In the NORDSTEN spinal stenosis trial (NORDSTEN-SST) 437 patients were randomized to three different midline-retaining posterior decompression techniques: Unilateral laminotomy with crossover (UL), bilateral laminotomy (BL) and spinous process osteotomy (SPO). Primary outcome was the mean change in Oswestry disability index (ODI) score at five-years follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients classified as success, mean change in EQ-5D, ZCQ-score, NRS-score for leg and low back pain, a seven-point Global Perceived Effect (GPE) Scale and proportion of subsequential spinal surgery.

Results: The number of patients that completed follow-up data after five years was 358 (82%): In the UL, BL and SPO group the numbers were 122, 119 and 117, respectively. Mean age at baseline was 66.7 (SD 8.2) years, mean BMI was 27.8 (SD 4.1), and 172/358 (48%) were female. In the UL group the mean change was -18.2 (95% CI -21.0 -5.4), in the BL group it was -19.0 (95% CI -21.9-16.1) and in the SPO it was -18.6 (95% CI -21.6-15.7) (p = 0.917). No significant differences in the secondary outcomes between the three surgical groups were found, also the subsequent spinal surgery rates were similar.

Conclusion: There were no significant differences in patient reported outcomes and subsequent spinal surgery rates after the three different decompression techniques at five-year follow-up.

Keywords: Bilateral laminotomy (BL); Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS); Posterior decompression techniques; Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT); Spinous process osteotomy (SPO); Unilateral laminotomy with crossover (UL).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Katz JN, Dalgas M, Stucki G, Katz NP, Bayley J, Fossel AH, Chang LC, Lipson SJ (1995) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination. Arthr Rheum 38:1236–1241 - DOI
    1. Ravindra VM, Senglaub SS, Rattani A, Dewan MC, Hartl R, Bisson E, Park KB, Shrime MG (2018) Degenerative lumbar spine disease: estimating global incidence and worldwide volume. Glob Spine J 8:784–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218770769 - DOI
    1. Grotle M, Smastuen MC, Fjeld O, Grovle L, Helgeland J, Storheim K, Solberg TK, Zwart JA (2019) Lumbar spine surgery across 15 years: trends, complications and reoperations in a longitudinal observational study from Norway. BMJ Open 9:e028743. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028743 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10 year study. Spine 25:1424–1435 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson A, Blood E, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H (2010) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine 35:1329–1338. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e0f04d - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources