Increasing transparency of computer-aided detection impairs decision-making in visual search
- PMID: 39448515
- PMCID: PMC12000113
- DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02601-5
Increasing transparency of computer-aided detection impairs decision-making in visual search
Abstract
Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to changes in healthcare. Government and regulatory bodies have advocated the need for transparency in AI systems with recommendations to provide users with more details about AI accuracy and how AI systems work. However, increased transparency could lead to negative outcomes if humans become overreliant on the technology. This study investigated how changes in AI transparency affected human decision-making in a medical-screening visual search task. Transparency was manipulated by either giving or withholding knowledge about the accuracy of an 'AI system'. We tested performance in seven simulated lab mammography tasks, in which observers searched for a cancer which could be correctly or incorrectly flagged by computer-aided detection (CAD) 'AI prompts'. Across tasks, the CAD systems varied in accuracy. In the 'transparent' condition, participants were told the accuracy of the CAD system, in the 'not transparent' condition, they were not. The results showed that increasing CAD transparency impaired task performance, producing an increase in false alarms, decreased sensitivity, an increase in recall rate, and a decrease in positive predictive value. Along with increasing investment in AI, this research shows that it is important to investigate how transparency of AI systems affect human decision-making. Increased transparency may lead to overtrust in AI systems, which can impact clinical outcomes.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Computer-aided detection (CAD); Low prevalence; Overreliance; Transparency; Visual search.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest/Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest/competing interests. Ethics approval: Ethical approval for all studies was granted by the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee at the University of Warwick. Consent to participate: All participants provided informed consent prior to completing the experiment. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Open practices statement: The data and materials for all experiments are available online ( https://osf.io/zrafu/ ). None of the experiments were preregistered.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study.Eur Radiol. 2023 Oct;33(10):7186-7198. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09692-z. Epub 2023 May 16. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37188881
-
Mammographic Surveillance After Breast-Conserving Therapy: Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Jan;218(1):42-51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26506. Epub 2021 Aug 11. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022. PMID: 34378399
-
Effect of Uncertainty-Aware AI Models on Pharmacists' Reaction Time and Decision-Making in a Web-Based Mock Medication Verification Task: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Apr 18;13:e64902. doi: 10.2196/64902. JMIR Med Inform. 2025. PMID: 40249341 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Artificial Intelligence for breast cancer detection: Technology, challenges, and prospects.Eur J Radiol. 2024 Jun;175:111457. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111457. Epub 2024 Apr 16. Eur J Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38640824 Review.
-
Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Apr;53(2):171-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02062.x. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19527363 Review.
References
-
- Alexander, A., Jiang, A., Ferreira, C., & Zurkiya, D. (2020). An intelligent future for medical imaging: A market outlook on artificial intelligence for medical imaging. Journal of the American College of Radiology,17(1), 165–170. - PubMed
-
- Allen, B., Agarwal, S., Coombs, L., Wald, C., & Dreyer, K. (2021). 2020 ACR Data Science Institute artificial intelligence survey. Journal of the American College of Radiology,18(8), 1153–1159. - PubMed
-
- Aro, A. R. (2000). False-positive findings in mammography screening induces short-term distress—Breast cancer-specific concern prevails longer. European Journal of Cancer,36, 1089–1097. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous