Effectiveness of a dynamic seat cushion on recovery and recurrence of neck and low back pain in office workers: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 39448950
- PMCID: PMC11515401
- DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07947-4
Effectiveness of a dynamic seat cushion on recovery and recurrence of neck and low back pain in office workers: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Neck and low back pain are prevalent issues among office workers due to prolonged sitting, necessitating effective interventions. Dynamic seat cushion, designed to promote postural shifts, have emerged as promising solutions to address this concern. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a dynamic seat cushion on recovery and recurrence of neck and/or low back pain in office workers.
Methods: This study used 6-month follow-up data of a randomized controlled trial, involving 66 office workers who reported neck and/or low back pain during the trial. At baseline, participants were cluster-randomized into an intervention group, which received a dynamic seat cushion designed to encourage postural shifts, or a control group, which received a placebo seat pad. Health outcomes included recovery duration and recurrence of pain. Analyses utilized log rank test and Cox proportional hazard models.
Results: The recovery rate from neck and/or low back pain was 100% for the intervention group, and 86% for the control group. The median recovery duration of participants who reported pain during the 6-month period was 1 month in the intervention group and 3 months in the control group. The intervention group had a higher probability of recovery compared to the control group (HRadj 4.35, 95% CI 1.87-10.11; p < 0.01). The recurrence rate of neck and low back pain was 27% in the intervention group, which was 75% in the control group. The Hazard Ratio, after adjustment, for the intervention group compared to the control group was 0.50 (95% CI = 0.11-2.12).
Conclusions: A dynamic seat cushion that encourages postural shifts shortened recovery duration of neck and low back pain among office workers. Due to small numbers, a potentially relevant reduction in the recurrence of neck and low back pain could not be statistically confirmed. A power analysis was not conducted for this secondary analysis, and future studies should be designed with adequate sample sizes to explore the recurrence of pain with greater statistical power.
Trial registration: This trial is retrospectively registered under the Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR20230623002 (23/06/2023).
Keywords: Dynamic sitting; Office worker; Postural shift.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
EMS and AJB declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The cushion being studied has currently been in the process of obtaining a patent owned by the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) and Chulalongkorn University. SC and PJ have been listed as inventors and may receive financial benefits from the patent.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The effectiveness of a dynamic seat cushion in preventing neck and low-back pain among high-risk office workers: a 6-month cluster-randomized controlled trial.Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Oct 1;50(7):555-566. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4184. Epub 2024 Aug 22. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024. PMID: 39169894 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of active break and postural shift interventions on recovery from and recurrence of neck and low back pain in office workers: A 3-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial.Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Dec;56:102451. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102451. Epub 2021 Aug 20. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021. PMID: 34450361 Clinical Trial.
-
Postural shifts and body perceived discomfort during 1-hour sitting when leaning and sitting on an air-filled seat cushion among healthy office workers.Ergonomics. 2024 Dec;67(12):2126-2137. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2372006. Epub 2024 Jun 27. Ergonomics. 2024. PMID: 38932623
-
Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 17;2019(11):CD012487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012487.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31742666 Free PMC article.
-
Ergonomic interventions for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck among office workers.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 23;10(10):CD008570. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008570.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30350850 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wu AM, Cross M, Elliott J, Culbreth G, Haile L, Steinmetz J, Rhinehart P, Kopec J, Brooks P, Woolf A. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Neck Pain, 1990 to 2020 and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the global burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023;6(3):e142-55. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Leijten FR, van den Heuvel SG, Ybema JF, van der Beek AJ, Robroek SJ, Burdorf A. The influence of chronic health problems on work ability and productivity at work: a longitudinal study among older employees. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014;40(5):473–82. - PubMed
-
- Mesas AE, González AD, Mesas CE, de Andrade SM, Magro IS, del Llano J. The association of chronic neck pain, low back pain, and migraine with absenteeism due to health problems in Spanish workers. Spine. 2014;39(15):1243–53. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical