Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1285.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05009-8.

Clinical performance of polyethylenefiber reinforced resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth: (a randomized controlled clinical trial)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical performance of polyethylenefiber reinforced resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth: (a randomized controlled clinical trial)

Ahmed Abdelsattar Metwaly et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of polyethylene fiber reinforced resin composite fillings compared to bulk fill resin composite fillings in endodontically treated teeth over a two-year monitoring period.

Method: A total of 240 individuals with endodontically treated lower molars and a moderate amount of tooth structure were divided into two equal groups of 120 each. One group received polyethylene fiber reinforced bulk fill resin composite restorations while the other group received only bulk fill resin composite restorations, both applied as per manufacturer guidelines. Two proficient experienced blinded assessors assessed the restorations using modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months.

Statistical analysis used: Data analysis involved the utilization of Mann-Whitney U, Friedman's test, and Nemenyi post hoc test, with age data being displayed as mean and standard deviation. The significance level was established as p < 0.05, and R software was utilized for statistical analysis.

Results: There were no notable distinctions in any parameters or scores between the intervention and comparator groups at various time points. Alpha scores were present for retention, gross fracture, and secondary caries at all follow up intervals.

Conclusion: Both direct resin composite restorations reinforced with polyethylene fibers and direct bulk fill resin composite restorations placed in endodontically treated molars with moderate remaining tooth structure demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes during a 24-month follow-up period.

Clinical relevance: Bulk fill resin composites directly placed in endodontically treated molars with moderate remaining tooth structure showed promise as a treatment option over a two-year period.

Clinical trial registration: (06-01-2022) on https://ClinicalTrials.gov with the ID (NCT05180903).

Keywords: Bulk fill composite; Class II cavities; Clinical trial that is controlled and randomized; Fiber reinforced composite; Polyethylene fibers; Ribbond; Teeth that have undergone endodontic treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Lower first molar cavity has been prepared; (B) ribbond pieces were applied against proximal walls; (C) the cavity was filled with bulk fill flowable resin composite (X-tra base) but stopped 2 mm before reaching the occlusal surface. Next, the rest of the occlusal portion of the cavity was repaired with a universal nano hybrid resin composite; (D) after finishing and polishing of restoration
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Consort flow diagram showing the process of case selection
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A representative case showing lower first molar restored with Polyethylene Fiber (Ribbond) Reinforced Resin Composite Restoration at 24 months follow up period recorded “Bravo” score in marginal adaptation and staining
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A representative case showing lower first molar restored with Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restoration (X-tra base & GrandioSO) at 24 months follow up period recorded “Alpha” score in marginal adaptation and staining

References

    1. Selvaraj H, Krithikadatta J, Shrivastava D, Onazi MA, Algarni HA, Munaga S, Hamza MO, saad Al-fridy T, Teja KV, Janani K, Alam MK. Systematic review fracture resistance of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with fiber reinforced composites-a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):566. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kimble P, Stuhr S, McDonald N, Venugopalan A, Campos MS, Cavalcanti B. Decision making in the restoration of endodontically treated Teeth: Effect of Biomimetic Dentistry Training. Dentistry J. 2023;11(7):159. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J. 1995;28(1):12–8. - PubMed
    1. Garoushi S, Gargoum A, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Short fiber-reinforced composite restorations: a review of the current literature. J Invest Clin Dent. 2018;9(3):e12330. - PubMed
    1. Valizadeh S, Ranjbar Omrani L, Deliperi S, Sadeghi Mahounak F. Restoration of a nonvital tooth with fiber reinforce composite (wallpapering technique). Case reports in dentistry. 2020;2020. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources