Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1279.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04918-y.

The effect of different treatment protocols on shear bond strength in resin composite restoration repair

Affiliations

The effect of different treatment protocols on shear bond strength in resin composite restoration repair

Ayşenur Bulut et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: It was aimed to investigate the effect of sandblasting and laser surface treatment on shear bond strength in composite restoration repair in vitro.

Methods: A micro-hybrid composite (Filtek Z250, 3 M-ESPE, USA) was used to prepare 120 samples. The samples were subjected to a thermal cycle test 5,000 times between 5 and 55 0C, and they were randomly divided into 12 groups (n = 10). No surface treatment was performed in Groups 1 to 4, which were designed as control groups. The surfaces of the samples in Groups 5 to 8 were sandblasted with a Cojet device, and the surfaces of the samples in Groups 9 to 12 were applied Er, Cr: YSGG laser. After the sample surfaces were divided into groups with and without acid etching, universal adhesive was applied, and the repair process was performed using Filtek Z250 or nano-filled resin composite (Filtek Ultimate, 3 M-ESPE, USA). The thermal cycle test was repeated 5,000 times between 5 and 55 0C on all repaired samples. The repair shear bond strength of the samples was measured using a universal testing device (Shimadzu IG-IS, Kyoto, Japan). The fracture types were evaluated by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analyses of the findings were evaluated by the Kruskal Wallis test and Mann Whitney U test at 0.05 significance degree.

Results: The highest mean shear bond strength values were obtained from the samples sandblasted with CoJet, followed by Er, Cr: YSGG laser, and the control group. It was determined that there was a significant difference between the mean shear bond strength values obtained from the control group and the other surface treatment groups (p < 0.05). In general, significantly higher mean shear bond strength values were obtained when the universal adhesive was applied in total-etch mode compared to the application in self-etch mode (p < 0.05). Additionally, it was determined that higher shear bond strength values were obtained with Filtek Ultimate compared to Filtek Z250 (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the use of universal adhesive in total-etch mode, in addition to surface treatments on the resin composite surface in the repair protocol and the use of nano-filled resin composite as repair material can increase the mean shear bond values in repair.

Keywords: Adhesives; Composite resins; Lasers; Shear strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image after applying the repair treatment to the resin composite sample surface
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SEM images of all the examined groups after shear bond strength test
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
SEM images of sample surfaces after surface tretaments were performed (a, b, c: SEM image of the sample surfaces of the control group at x500, x1000, x2000 magnification, d, e, f: SEM image of the sample surfaces of the Sandblasting with CoJet group at x500, x1000, x2000 magnification, g, h, j: SEM image of the sample surfaces belonging to the Er, Cr: YSGG laser treatment group at x500, x1000, x2000 magnification)

References

    1. Mammadlı N. Minimally invasive treatment approaches in Pediatric Dentistry, HEALTH & SCIENCE 2022: Odontology-II, Assist Prof. Istanbul: Aycan DAL DÖNERTAŞ, Editor, Efe Academy; 2022. pp. 163–70.
    1. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84:118–32. 10.1177/154405910508400204. - PubMed
    1. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012;28:87–101. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003. - PubMed
    1. Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater. 2013;29:28–50. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.006. - PubMed
    1. Fernández E, Martín J, Vildósola P, Oliveira Junior OB, Gordan V, Mjor I, Bersezio C, Estay J, de Andrade MF, Moncada G. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. J Dent. 2015;43:279–86. 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.015. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources