Amphibious ethics and speculative immersions: laboratory aquariums as a site for developing a more inclusive animal geography
- PMID: 39449757
- PMCID: PMC11495481
- DOI: 10.1080/14702541.2024.2378308
Amphibious ethics and speculative immersions: laboratory aquariums as a site for developing a more inclusive animal geography
Abstract
Human capacity to sense and respond to the suffering of non-human animals is key to animal care and welfare. Intuitively these modes of relating seem best suited to interactions between humans and warm-blooded mammals who share human-like facial features and characteristics. Animal geographers and those working in animal welfare have noted the challenges that humans face in learning to care about fishes, and how this leads to welfare guidelines and regulations which are poorly suited to aquatic species. This paper draws on interviews with laboratory aquarists and biomedical researchers to explore how they have learnt to sense and respond to the needs of fishes in the laboratory. We offer two key observations. Firstly, despite significant bodily differences, humans find ways to empathise with fishes. Secondly, whilst observations of bodies and behaviours predominate in laboratory mammal welfare assessments, when working with fishes water quality serves as an important proxy for species health. We conclude that the laboratory aquarium signifies methodological and conceptual limits in contemporary animal geographies. We further argue that these barriers should be understood as cultural, and - as we demonstrate - that there is consequently scope and capacity to reach beyond them by engaging in amphibious ethics and speculative immersions.
Keywords: Animal geographies; empathy; ethics; fish; marginalisation.
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Figures


Similar articles
-
Opportunities for public aquariums to increase the sustainability of the aquatic animal trade.Zoo Biol. 2013 Jan-Feb;32(1):1-12. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21019. Epub 2012 May 1. Zoo Biol. 2013. PMID: 22549966
-
Attuning to laboratory animals and telling stories: Learning animal geography research skills from animal technologists.Environ Plan D. 2019 Apr;37(2):367-384. doi: 10.1177/0263775818807720. Epub 2018 Oct 29. Environ Plan D. 2019. PMID: 32655205 Free PMC article.
-
Using ecosystem health and welfare assessments to determine impacts of wild collection for public aquariums.PLoS One. 2023 May 2;18(5):e0285198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285198. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37130145 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of interacting with fish in aquariums on human health and well-being: A systematic review.PLoS One. 2019 Jul 29;14(7):e0220524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220524. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31356652 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological and social well-being of bony fishes in zoos and aquariums.Zoo Biol. 2023 Mar;42(2):185-193. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21729. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Zoo Biol. 2023. PMID: 36065963 Review.
References
-
- Acampora, R. R. (2006). Corporeal compassion. University of Pittsburgh Press.
-
- Ahmed, S. (2007). A phenomenology of whiteness. Feminist Theory, 8(2), 149–168. 10.1177/1464700107078139 - DOI
-
- Alaimo, S. (2019). Introduction: Science studies and the blue humanities. Configurations, 27(4), 429–432. 10.1353/con.2019.0028 - DOI
-
- Allmark-Kent, C. (2021). How to read fishes: Science, empathy, and Salar the Salmon. Society & Animals, 30(2), 170–187. 10.1163/15685306-12341569 - DOI
-
- Anand, N. (2023). Anthroposea: Planning future ecologies in Mumbai’s wetscapes. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 41(4), 683–706. 10.1177/02637758231183439 - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources