Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 24;16(9):e70067.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.70067. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Evidence-Based Critical Assessment of the Success Rate of Dental Implants in Smokers: An Umbrella Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Evidence-Based Critical Assessment of the Success Rate of Dental Implants in Smokers: An Umbrella Systematic Review

Ujjaini Banerjee et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

The aim of this umbrella systematic review is to evaluate the success rate and osseointegration of dental implants in patients with a smoking habit. Electronic database searches of PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and EBSCOhost were done from 2006 until August 2024, using medical subject headings (MeSH) terms. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) investigating the association between smoking and the rate of success of dental implants based on dental implant failure, marginal bone loss, survival, and peri-implant parameters were deemed eligible. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews Tool 2 (AMSTAR 2) was used to assess the quality of the included SRMAs. Seventeen systematic reviews have been included. In the reviews, 10 studies included meta-analyses (MAs) that evaluated implant failure rate and marginal bone loss. According to the AMSTAR 2 checklist, one review was scored "high," seven reviews were scored "moderate," seven reviews were scored "low," and two reviews were scored "critically low" quality. The strength of evidence suggests a low level of success and high rate of failure of osseointegration of dental implants in smokers. However, the influence of smoking on the rate of dental implant failure seems to be associated with various factors such as peri-implant inflammatory markers, post-operative infections, etc. Inherently, the conclusion of this review is based on a limited number of systematic reviews.

Keywords: dental implants; implant failure; marginal bone loss; meta-analysis; osseointegration; smoking; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of the selection process of the reviews
A flowchart explaining the process of selection of reviews according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smoking interferes with the prognosis of dental implant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Strietzel FP, Reichart PA, Kale A, Kulkarni M, Wegner B, Küchler I. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34:523–544. - PubMed
    1. Impact of smoking habit on peri-implant indicators following different therapies: a systematic review. Farronato D, Azzi L, Giboli L, Maurino V, Tartaglia GM, Farronato M. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022;9:569. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tobacco use and periodontal disease-the role of microvascular dysfunction. Silva H. Biology (Basel) 2021;10:441. - PMC - PubMed
    1. A nine-step pathway to conduct an umbrella review of literature. Cant R, Ryan C, Kelly MA. Nurse Author Ed. 2022;32:31–34.
    1. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. Syst Rev. 2021;10:89. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources