Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct 9:61:97-102.
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.002. eCollection 2025 Mar.

The performance of cruciate-retaining implants for primary total knee arthroplasty in valgus deformed knees: A systematic review

Affiliations
Review

The performance of cruciate-retaining implants for primary total knee arthroplasty in valgus deformed knees: A systematic review

Peter A Falgiano et al. J Orthop. .

Abstract

Background: Valgus deformity of the knee comprises upwards of 15 % of the deformities in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. 1,2 The two implants most commonly used in valgus deformed knees are posterior stabilizing (PS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) implants. CR implants may offer a more advantageous construct due to the retention of the PCL for proprioception and less bony resection compared to PS implants. The purpose of this systematic review is to aggregate findings for cruciate-retaining implants used in primary TKA with valgus deformed knees.

Methods: In compliance with PRISMA guidelines, databases were queried for CR TKA studies which met the inclusion criteria. Cochrane ROBINS-I and the GRADE framework assessed bias and quality respectively.

Results: There was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) difference between preoperative and postoperative valgus deformity as measured by tibiofemoral angle. The all-cause revision rate was 8.3 % in our sample of 710 total knee arthroplasties.

Conclusion: This review of the literature demonstrates that, although scarcely reported, cruciate-retaining implants used in primary total knee arthroplasties in valgus deformed knees provide satisfactory outcomes such as arc of motion and knee score. Our results demonstrate a significant increase in all-cause revision when using CR implants for valgus deformed knee. For this reason, further investigations should be conducted to evaluate modes of failure in this specific patient population.

Level of evidence: IV systematic review.

Keywords: Cruciate-retaining; Posterior stabilizing; Tibiofemoral angle; Total knee arthroplasty; Valgus knee.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. AC discloses consultant relationship with Exactech and royalties with Arthrex. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Lange J., Haas S.B. Correcting severe valgus deformity: taking out the knock. Bone Joint Lett J. Jan 2017;99-b(1 Supple A):60–64. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b1.Bjj-2016-0340.R1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ranawat A.S., Ranawat C.S., Elkus M., Rasquinha V.J., Rossi R., Babhulkar S. Total knee arthroplasty for severe valgus deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 2005;87(Pt 2):271–284. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.E.00308. Suppl 1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh J.A., Yu S., Chen L., Cleveland J.D. Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: future projections to 2020-2040 using the national inpatient sample. J Rheumatol. Sep 2019;46(9):1134–1140. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170990. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Favorito P.J., Mihalko W.M., Krackow K.A. Total knee arthroplasty in the valgus knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Jan-Feb 2002;10(1):16–24. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200201000-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Savov P., Mielke E., Windhagen H., Calliess T., Richter A., Ettinger M. Higher revision rate for posterior cruciate-retaining than posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of valgus osteoarthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Feb 2021;141(2):305–312. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03618-w. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources