Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Oct 2;31(10):5929-5942.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol31100442.

The Frequency of Urination Dysfunction in Patients Operated on for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The Frequency of Urination Dysfunction in Patients Operated on for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses

Dagný Halla Ágústsdóttir et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

The frequency of long-term urination dysfunction after surgery for rectal cancer remains unclear, yet it is essential to establish this to improve treatment strategies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and cohort studies were included with patients having undergone sphincter-preserving total (TME) or partial mesorectal excision (PME) for the treatment of primary rectal cancer in this review. The outcome was urination dysfunction reported at least three months postoperatively, both overall urination dysfunction and subdivided into specific symptoms. The online databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched, bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and results were synthesized using one-group frequency meta-analyses. A total of 55 studies with 15,072 adults were included. The median follow-up was 29 months (range 3-180). The pooled overall urination dysfunction was 21% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12%-30%) 3-11 months postoperatively and 25% (95% CI 19%-32%) ≥12 months postoperatively. Retention and incontinence were common 3-11 months postoperatively, with pooled frequencies of 11% and 14%, respectively. Increased urinary frequency, retention, and incontinence seemed even more common ≥12 months postoperatively, with pooled frequencies of 37%, 20%, and 23%, respectively. In conclusion, one in five patients experienced urination dysfunction more than a year following an operation for rectal cancer.

Keywords: late complications; rectal cancer; total mesorectal excision; urinary incontinence; urinary retention; urination disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 flow diagram of the study selection process. n: number.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Forest plot depicting one-group meta-analysis of overall urination dysfunction 3–11 months after surgery [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,36,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. CI: confidence interval. (b) Forest plot depicting one-group meta-analysis of overall urination dysfunction ≥12 months after surgery [8,28,29,35,36,47,48,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,58,59,60,61]. CI: confidence interval. (c) Forest plot depicting one-group meta-analysis of overall urination dysfunction ≥3 months after surgery but not further specified [61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. CI: confidence interval.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Forest plot depicting one-group meta-analysis of overall urination dysfunction 3–11 months after surgery [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,36,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. CI: confidence interval. (b) Forest plot depicting one-group meta-analysis of overall urination dysfunction ≥12 months after surgery [8,28,29,35,36,47,48,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,58,59,60,61]. CI: confidence interval. (c) Forest plot depicting one-group meta-analysis of overall urination dysfunction ≥3 months after surgery but not further specified [61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. CI: confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Birgisson H., Talbäck M., Gunnarsson U., Påhlman L., Glimelius B. Improved survival in cancer of the colon and rectum in Sweden. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2005;31:845–853. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.05.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J., Colombet M., Soerjomataram I., Dyba T., Randi G., Bettio M., Gavin A., Visser O., Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur. J. Cancer. 2018;103:356–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J., Ervik M., Lam F., Laversanne M., Colombet M., Mery L., Pineros M., Znaor A., Soerjomataram I., Bray F. Cancer Site Ranking. 2024. [(accessed on 19 August 2024)]. Available online: https://gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/cancers/39-all-cancer....
    1. Dulskas A., Miliauskas P., Tikuisis R., Escalante R., Samalavicius N.E. The functional results of radical rectal cancer surgery: Review of the literature. Acta Chir. Belg. 2016;116:1–10. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2015.1136482. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Celentano V., Cohen R., Warusavitarne J., Faiz O., Chand M. Sexual dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery. Int. J. Color. Dis. 2017;32:1523–1530. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2826-4. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources