Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 3;31(10):5960-5973.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol31100445.

Impact of PRECEDE-PROCEED Model Audits in Cancer Screening Programs in Lombardy Region: Supporting Equity and Quality Improvement

Stefano Odelli  1   2 , Margherita Zeduri  1   3 , Maria Rosa Schivardi  1 , Davide Archi  4 , Liliana Coppola  1 , Roberto Genco Russo  4 , Maristella Moscheni  4 , Elena Tettamanzi  1 , Fabio Terragni  4 , Michela Viscardi  1 , Valentina Vitale  4 , Anna Odone  3 , Danilo Cereda  1 , Silvia Deandrea  1   5
Affiliations

Impact of PRECEDE-PROCEED Model Audits in Cancer Screening Programs in Lombardy Region: Supporting Equity and Quality Improvement

Stefano Odelli et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Health disparities related to socio-economic factors impact access to preventive health interventions. The PRECEDE-PROCEED model, a multidimensional approach to health promotion, has been adapted to optimise cancer screening programs in Lombardy, Italy, addressing these disparities.

Methods: This study evaluated the application of systemic audits based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model across Lombardy cancer screening programs. A systematic region-wide audit was performed in 2019, and follow-up audits were performed in 2022-2023. Data were collected using structured analysis methodologies, including epidemiological, behavioural, and organisational assessments.

Results: The 2019 audit showed strengths in participation and quality standards but identified challenges in cervical cancer screening coverage and waiting times for assessments. Improvements plans included the digitisation of processes and stakeholder engagement. The 2022-2023 audits reported increased coverage for breast and colorectal screenings, but a slight decline in participation rates and examination coverage. Organisational improvements were noted, yet gaps in training and equity-targeted actions remained.

Conclusion: The PRECEDE-PROCEED model audits led to notable improvements in the quality and equity of cancer screening programs in Lombardy. Sustained focus on digital integration, continuous re-training, and targeted equity interventions is essential for further progress.

Keywords: Lombardy region; PRECEDE–PROCEED model; audit; cancer screening; equity; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentages of achievement of target by thematic area for each HPA, 2019 audit cycle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average of percentages of achievement of target by thematic area for Lombardy region, 2019 audit cycle.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentages of achievement of target by thematic area for each HPA, 2022/2023 audit cycle.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Average of percentages of achievement of target by thematic area for Lombardy region, 2022/2023 audit cycle.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. WHO. Commission on Social Determinants Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland. [(accessed on 21 July 2024)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-IER-CSDH-08.1.
    1. Comunicazione al Parlamento Europeo al Consiglio, al Comitato Economico e Sociale Europeo e al Comitato delle Regioni: Solidarietà in Materia di Salute, Riduzione delle Disuguaglianze Sanitarie all’interno dell’UE. Commissione delle Comunità Europee; Belgium, Bruxelles: 2009. p. 567.
    1. Costa G., Marinacci C., Caiazzo A., Spadea T. Individual and contextual determinants of inequalities in health: The Italian case. Int. J. Health Serv. 2003;33:635–667. doi: 10.2190/AM8R-K0DY-F7PM-3RNP. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eikemo T., Hoffmann R., Kulik M., Kulhánová I., Toch M., Menvielle G.F.M., Costa G., Mackenbach J. In: EURO-GBD-SE: The Potential for Reduction of Health Inequalities in Europe Part 1 and Part 2. Eikemo T.A., Mackenbach J.P., editors. Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC; Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 2012. pp. 313–362.
    1. Caranci N., Di Girolamo C., Giorgi Rossi P., Spadea T., Pacelli B., Broccoli S., Ballotari P., Costa G., Zengarini N., Agabiti N., et al. Cohort profile: The Italian Network of Longitudinal Metropolitan Studies (IN-LiMeS), a multicentre cohort for socioeconomic inequalities in health monitoring. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e020572. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020572. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources