Overview of High-Dynamic-Range Image Quality Assessment
- PMID: 39452406
- PMCID: PMC11508586
- DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10100243
Overview of High-Dynamic-Range Image Quality Assessment
Abstract
In recent years, the High-Dynamic-Range (HDR) image has gained widespread popularity across various domains, such as the security, multimedia, and biomedical fields, owing to its ability to deliver an authentic visual experience. However, the extensive dynamic range and rich detail in HDR images present challenges in assessing their quality. Therefore, current efforts involve constructing subjective databases and proposing objective quality assessment metrics to achieve an efficient HDR Image Quality Assessment (IQA). Recognizing the absence of a systematic overview of these approaches, this paper provides a comprehensive survey of both subjective and objective HDR IQA methods. Specifically, we review 7 subjective HDR IQA databases and 12 objective HDR IQA metrics. In addition, we conduct a statistical analysis of 9 IQA algorithms, incorporating 3 perceptual mapping functions. Our findings highlight two main areas for improvement. Firstly, the size and diversity of HDR IQA subjective databases should be significantly increased, encompassing a broader range of distortion types. Secondly, objective quality assessment algorithms need to identify more generalizable perceptual mapping approaches and feature extraction methods to enhance their robustness and applicability. Furthermore, this paper aims to serve as a valuable resource for researchers by discussing the limitations of current methodologies and potential research directions in the future.
Keywords: high dynamic range; objective image quality assessment; subjective image quality assessment.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Blind Quality Estimation by Disentangling Perceptual and Noisy Features in High Dynamic Range Images.IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018 Mar;27(3):1512-1525. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2778570. Epub 2017 Nov 29. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018. PMID: 29990064
-
Blind HDR image quality assessment based on aggregating perception and inference features.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 28;15(1):10808. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94005-1. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40155481 Free PMC article.
-
No-reference high-dynamic-range image quality assessment based on tensor decomposition and manifold learning.Appl Opt. 2018 Feb 1;57(4):839-848. doi: 10.1364/AO.57.000839. Appl Opt. 2018. PMID: 29400748
-
Review of Image Quality Assessment Methods for Compressed Images.J Imaging. 2024 May 8;10(5):113. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10050113. J Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38786567 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quantifying Visual Image Quality: A Bayesian View.Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2021 Sep 15;7:437-464. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-100419-120301. Epub 2021 Aug 4. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2021. PMID: 34348034 Review.
References
-
- Metzler C.A., Ikoma H., Peng Y., Wetzstein G. Deep optics for single-shot high-dynamic-range imaging; Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Seattle, WA, USA. 13–19 June 2020; pp. 1375–1385.
-
- Sánchez D., Gómez S., Mauricio J., Freixas L., Sanuy A., Guixé G., López A., Manera R., Marín J., Pérez J.M., et al. HRFlexToT: A high dynamic range ASIC for time-of-flight positron emission tomography. IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 2021;6:51–67. doi: 10.1109/TRPMS.2021.3066426. - DOI
-
- Wang Z., Chen W., Xing J., Zhang X., Tian H., Tang H., Bi P., Li G., Zhang F. Extracting vegetation information from high dynamic range images with shadows: A comparison between deep learning and threshold methods. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2023;208:107805. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.107805. - DOI
-
- Narwaria M., Da Silva M.P., Le Callet P., Pepion R. Tone mapping-based high-dynamic-range image compression: Study of optimization criterion and perceptual quality. Opt. Eng. 2013;52:102008. doi: 10.1117/1.OE.52.10.102008. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources