Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2441019.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41019.

Nurse Telephone Support for Caregivers of Older Adults at Hospital Discharge: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Nurse Telephone Support for Caregivers of Older Adults at Hospital Discharge: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Anne-Marie Hill et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Informal caregivers who provide home-based care frequently experience stress and burden that adversely affect their health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the Further Enabling Care at Home (FECH+) program for the HRQOL of caregivers of older adults discharged home from the hospital.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter, parallel, 2-group randomized clinical trial, with blinded baseline and outcome measurements, was conducted at 3 hospitals in 2 states in Australia. Recruitment took place between August 2020 and July 2022, and follow-up was performed for 12 months after hospital discharge. Participants were dyads of caregivers and patients. Eligible caregivers were aged 18 years or older who provided informal home-based care at least weekly for a patient aged 70 years or older. Caregivers were enrolled when their patient was discharged from the hospital. Dyads were randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. Data analysis followed an intention-to-treat approach.

Intervention: Caregivers in the intervention group received the FECH+ program, structured nurse support of 6 telephone calls over 6 months after the patient's discharge plus usual discharge care. Caregivers in the control group received usual care alone.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome was caregivers' HRQOL 6 months after discharge, which was measured using the Assessment of Quality of Life 8-Dimension (AQOL-8D). Secondary outcomes were caregivers' HRQOL 12 months after discharge as well as preparedness to care (measured using the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale), self-efficacy (measured using the Caregiver Inventory), and levels of strain and distress (measured using the Family Appraisal of Caregiving Questionnaire) at 6 and 12 months after discharge. Baseline and outcome measurements were administered by telephone at 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge.

Results: A total of 547 dyads (caregivers: 405 females [74.0%], mean [SD] age, 64.50 [12.82] years; patients: 296 females [54.1%], mean [SD] age, 83.16 [7.04] years for the intervention group and 83.45 [7.20] years for the control group) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. There was no significant difference in caregivers' HRQOL between the 2 groups at the primary time point of 6 months (difference in AQOL-8D score, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03; P = .62) after hospital discharge.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the FECH+ program-a nurse telephone support intervention for caregivers of older adults after hospital discharge-did not significantly improve caregivers' HRQOL at 6 months after discharge compared with usual care. Additional examination is warranted into improving caregivers' HRQOL at the time of their patient's hospital discharge.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12620000060943.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Prof A-M. Hill reported receiving a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australia and an Australia Investigator award from the Royal Perth Hospital Research Foundation during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. Prof Moyle reported receiving a grant from the NHMRC during the conduct of the study. Ms Reberger reported receiving a grant from the NHMRC during the conduct of the study. Dr Jones reported receiving a grant from the NHMRC during the conduct of the study. Dr Maher reported receiving a grant from the NHMRC during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Participant Flow Through the Trial
CALD indicates culturally and linguistically diverse; FECH+, Further Enabling Care at Home. aScreening in Queensland was interrupted due to COVID-19 pandemic–related ward access restrictions.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Secondary Outcomes
Preparedness to care was measured with the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale (PCS; score range, 0-4, with higher scores indicating greater preparedness for caregiving). Self-efficacy was assessed with the Caregiver Inventory (CGI; score range, 21-189, with higher scores indicating better self-efficacy). Levels of strain and distress were measured with the Family Appraisal of Caregiving Questionnaire (FACQ; score range, 5-25 (strain) and 8 to 30 (distress), with higher scores indicating lower levels of strain and distress. Error bars represent 95% CIs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. 2020. Report: caregiving in the US. National Alliance for Caregiving ; AARP. Accessed March 30, 2024. https://www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/full-report-caregi...
    1. Petrillo M, Bennet M. Valuing carers 2021: England and Wales. Accessed March 30, 2024. https://www.carersuk.org/reports/valuing-carers-research-report/
    1. Schirmer J, Mylek M, Miranti R. Caring for Others and Yourself. Canberra, ACT: Carer’s Australia and University of Canberra; 2022. Accessed March 30, 2024. https://www.carersaustralia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/211011_Car...
    1. Reinhard SC, Caldera S, Houser A, Choula RB. Valuing the invaluable: 2023. update: strengthening supports for family caregivers. Accessed March 30, 2024. https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/ppi/2023/3/valuing-the-invaluable-...
    1. Unpaid carers: a silent workforce. Lancet Public Health. 2024;9(1):e1. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00311-0 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types